ABOUT CLICKED

The modern news consumer ignores Weblogs and online citizen journalism at his own peril. But not everyone has the time to keep track of what's going on the Web. With this blog we hope to track the highlights of what's being discussed online so when news breaks from the Web, we're ready.

Will Femia is a Weblog enthusiast who, through good fortune and dumb luck, was introduced to the form as his position as chat producer for MSNBC.com careered into obsolescence. On any given day, Will can be found having already spent an unhealthy amount of time squinting at a computer screen.

Send a message to Will at spotter@msnbc.com



You can't do that with breasts

Posted: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 10:35 AM by Will Femia

When I read the Ann Althouse piece on the inappropriateness of the pose and breasts (*** presentation?) of a female blogger standing with President Clinton at a group lunch, and compared it with the photo in question, I was pretty baffled.

Maybe there's some kind of cultural difference between Ann and me, but that gal doesn't look in the least bit provocative to me.  Then I clicked through to Dr. Helen's criticisms and her subsequent updates to understand the that the issue has to do with whether a feminist can pose for a photo with President Clinton without compromising her (or his) standards.

But then, as the gal in question points out, if that's the issue, what's all the talk about breasts?

Clicking through further "hat tips" and "via" links sees the discussion narrowed to the question of the definition of a provocative stance and whether women have to be on constant guard about with whom they pose and how they look when they do.  (And for that matter whether a woman is provocative by definition and whether that's even her problem.)

Which brought be to Glenn's tangent about what's appropriate attire when posing with a president.  (Never mind provocative, is the outfit too casual?)

I'm trying to summarize detailed positions in just a few words here, so it's best to click through these links to get the full argument.  As an observer, it's a great little blog storm that covers a lot of compelling topics and kept me occupied most of the morning.

Speaking of body parts, we took a few minutes around the water cooler yesterday to talk about the story of the man who asked that his penis transplant be removed.  Apparently, even though the procedure was a success, he (and his wife?) was unable to deal psychologically with the idea of having the penis of a dead man.  The article includes a few other examples of this kind of psychological rejection of transplants.  It's an interesting case of science outpacing culture.

World record cup stacking - It's an international sport I guess.

Islam-watching bloggers are focused on a particular threat lately, gathering and displaying as much information about the plotter as possible.  Of particular interest is the possibility that a blog reader actually had an encounter with the terrorist in question.  My sanity doesn't allow me to keep meticulous track of who is making what threats, but it'll be interesting to see if this particular case has legs.

“Hotel Minibar” Keys Open Diebold Voting Machines - Tsk.  I mean, really!

As was pointed out in the mail yesterday, today is Talk Like A Pirate Day.  Here's an instructional video in case you need help.

Speaking of things pointed out yesterday.  15 ways to get more out of Pandora.  (That's the online music service.)

Breathing Earth animation shows birth and death rates along with CO2 emissions by country on a world map.  I'm not sure what the connection is, but it's interesting to watch.  I would have expected the birth/death counter to move faster.

Eragon trailer - Swords, horses and English accents... oh, and dragons.

Amazing paper sculpture - It's not origami exactly, but similar.  I feel like we've seen this type of art before, but I don't recognize these particular pieces.  There's an artist note at the bottom.

Coin through soda can trick revealed - Even with the instructions, it's not really a layman's trick.  The coin passing from hand to hand takes a lot of practice.

Mini helicopter for 30 bucks

Speaking of buying stuff, Boing Boing Digital Emporium: "Our favorite digital products for sale at low prices and without irksome Digital Rights Management"

ThinkPad explodes at LAX - I suppose it makes every bit of sense that laptops are eventually going to be on the security ban list.  I can't imagine how security is going to keep track of which batteries are dangerous, however.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

The Althouse piece also puzzles me. What should be interesting about that photo is the guy on the far left, showing off something hidden in his pocket.
As far as the *** photo goes, any woman out there can tell you that every magazine you read growing up suggests you tilt your shoulders and stand on an angle to look skinnier in photos. Most women have had it drilled into their heads and do it automatically whenever a photo is taken. People are just reading way too far into that pose.  I do think she's dressed to casually though, which is really what makes her look so much more obvious than everyone else in the photo. A suit jacket would have covered up her breasts more and blended in with everyone else to the point where you'd never know she had breasts, much like the other women in the photo.
Apologies Amanda for those asterisks.  The software is blocking the word b-r-e-a-$-t for reasons I cannot comprehend.  Even sillier is that the plural, breasts is not being blocked.
Will, I agree with the idea that she's perchance slightly too casual to pose with a former president?!  Either way, I think viewers' eyes are drawn to the former president and her because of the simple fact that they are arguably the two most poised, confident-looking and attractive people in the photo.  I think she's gorgeous and would like to see her dress it up a little more.  More power to her.
I think that Clinton's people would prevent the picture from being taken if Clinton thought it was inapparopriate, and, of course, Clinton is the only person who has the right to an opinion. Clinton remains very popular, and those who attack him are usually just looking for attention.
My God...

This is worse than puzzling.

It is absolutely absurd.

Everyone on Clinton on either side are angled in to the center in the same way. Half the people (including the woman in question) are looking off to Clinton's left at something.

This shot is so thrown together, to think that any of the people are actively "posing" in a pre-meditated way is silly.

Will she say the Clinton's mouth half open/eyes half closed "pose" was premeditated? Or the guy with the "thing" in his pocket was trying to communicate something? Or that Duncan Black was intentionally hiding half of his face?

Her attire is modest and the black slacks and "t-shirt" are totally appropriate in virtually any office in the country.

And remember, this is a meeting of bloggers. She's not the most casually dressed person there.

And why no comment of the fetching Jane Hamsher's rather low-cut and more revealing dress?

Not sure why I'm taking the time to comment on this, but it was so totally off-base, I couldn't resist.

Oy.
Seriously, woman have breasts.  Get over it.  Who doesn't "pose" for a picture?  Any picture!  Ann Althouse needs to get a grip and probably a *** lift.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=4357