ABOUT CLICKED

The modern news consumer ignores Weblogs and online citizen journalism at his own peril. But not everyone has the time to keep track of what's going on the Web. With this blog we hope to track the highlights of what's being discussed online so when news breaks from the Web, we're ready.

Will Femia is a Weblog enthusiast who, through good fortune and dumb luck, was introduced to the form as his position as chat producer for MSNBC.com careered into obsolescence. On any given day, Will can be found having already spent an unhealthy amount of time squinting at a computer screen.

Send a message to Will at spotter@msnbc.com



Take your ball and go home

Posted: Saturday, March 17, 2007 12:58 AM by Will Femia

In case you needed more reasons to be disappointed in the federal government, the RIAA has apparently convinced the federal Copyright Royalty Board to implement an unreasonably high fee on online music, outraging everyone from NPR to cutting edge webcasters.

Speaking of corporations taking their ball and going home, what happens when Google loses?  By the end his short answer is that nothing happens.  It's not like Web video would come to an end or anything.  But what interested me about Scoble's perspective (remember his job now is making original Web-only video) is that he thinks Viacom is shooting itself in the foot because Web video is the future and if Viacom isn't going to share its content online audiences will watch something else online.  I have a hard time being completely convinced of that argument, probably because I watch so much corporate video (mostly on TV) that I'd probably end up watching it on an official site instead of YouTube.  But as a metaphor for the situation with Web radio I completely understand what he's saying.  If the RIAA is going to make it harder to listen to the music they represent their audience is going to end up discovering a lot of non-RIAA music online.  And non-RIAA musicians are going to have an easier time finding an audience eager for music.

Speaking of being better than anything you'd find from Viacom, here's Ze Frank on the nature of creativity (again) - This was his last week, though pretty much everyone expects him back by '08 in a newer, bigger, stronger way.  I never managed to be a regular Ze viewer but I've seen a bunch and more than once he's expressed this anxiety about whether he'll be creative tomorrow or even 5 minutes from now.  It's funny what he says about confidence because seeing him continue to produce in the face of his own anxiety boosts my own confidence that creativity comes when you let it.

Speaking of online radio, since a lot of people wrote in with a favorable reaction to Slacker.com radio (which hopefully won't have to go out of business now) here's a look at the player they're expected to release.  This would be the iPod killer part of their plan.

Speaking of not needing corporate approval to have a good time, the mistake in thinking that blogs will be extinct in ten years is thinking blogging is about the audience and quality expression.  Blogging is about self-expression which is part of the human condition.  The only way blogs will go extinct is if someone comes up with an even easier way to express oneself.  Until then there will continue to be bad blogs, bad music, bad art, etc. (and good too of course).

"A New Jersey civil engineer powers his home with solar panels and hydrogen tanks. Can it work in the mainstream?"  (His energy bill is zero.)

The universal rule for live performance is no kids and no animals.  Ignore this at your peril.

Rachmaninov had big Hands... but for everyone else...

Weird Al may be a dork but you have to admire his ability to fit these palindromes into a song.  Self-indulgent Weird Al anecdote:  Weird Al played at my college and I was dating a girl on the committee that set up the performance.  Among his requirements was an acoustic guitar that he would smash on the stage after singing an Every Rose Has A Thorn parody.  In the course of cleaning up the stage after the show my girl grabbed the guitar strap from the wreckage and gave it to me.  Yes, that means I have in my possession an authentic Weird Al guitar strap.

Delutube offers users a way to view deleted YouTube videos - That sounds like a big deal but I hit the random viewer button a few times and saw pretty much the same stuff I see on undeleted YouTube.  A huge girlfight, miniskirted teens doing wiggle lip syncs, regular old rock videos, homemade rocketry videos with copyrighted music soundtracks...  There's a chance you could see something genuinely tawdry but I wasn't so lucky.

I didn't realize such a big deal was being made over the 30th anniversary of Star Wars.

"The “visits” metric, defined as the number of times a unique person accesses content within a Web entity with breaks between access of at least 30 minutes, is a way of measuring the frequency with which a person views content, thereby illustrating a key component of user engagement."  Can 'Visits' Replace Pageviews?

Smoking 2.0 Gives Lungs a Break - It's battery powered and vaporizes the tobacco instead of burning it.  Doesn't that make it basically an inhaler?

When I heard the news that Democrats were being warned from appearing on The Colbert Report I thought it was an embarrassing admission that they aren't smart enough to defend their own positions against his parody arguments and silly verbal traps.  But reading the Hill story that brought the news I see that not going on Colbert is part of more positive advice: “Pay attention to your district, don’t go Washington, go home every weekend.”  Now I'm a little embarrassed at myself for caring about members of Congress on comedy shows.  Go do your jobs.

The bracelet phone - I want to be able to talk on it with it around my wrist, like Michael Knight summoning Kit.

I looked for a primary source link for this sport pump but I couldn't find it on the designer's site.

Last WWI Combat Veteran Laid to Rest - Of course this would happen eventually but it has such a Children of Men feeling the headline really stood out to me.

People are accusing Garrison Keillor of being anti-gay in this essay.  I think they're missing his point, which is that adults need to get over themselves and devote more of their lives to their children.  There may be room for discussion of whether there's "life after kids" but I don't think he's arguing that gay people are inherently too self absorbed to raise kids.  UPDATE: Thanks very much to JE in the comments for a counterpoint.  The link to which he refers is here.  Note, as he does that it has a pretty prominent F bomb on the page.  Also, the discussion in the comments section of the Savage entry is a good read.

How to surf anonymously without a trace

Giving Filmy, Flimsy Plastic Bags the Sack - I don't think this would be too great an inconvenience for the most part.  I imagine there'd either be a lot more satchel wearing or dual-purpose hairnets would come into fashion.

Richardson to legalize medical marijuana - The reason that's a big deal is that he's running for president.  The article mentions it being a political risk but who is it that opposes medical marijuana - other than the federal war on drugs folks?  There aren't religious objections that I know of.  Maybe law enforcement types who see it as likely to leak to the street?  The only real political risk in legalizing medical marijuana that I can think of is the exposure to the dishonest spin that's going to try to present it as "pro-drugs" or something.  Would anyone believe that?

My visual DNA - If you like horoscopes or those magazine quizzes you'll enjoy this.  Answer a set of questions based on your preferences and get a little evaluation of yourself.

Missionary encounters extremely bizarre skin condition in Eastern Europe NOTE: Pretty gross.  High potential for freakout.

Surfing the Pororoca

If you've been considering Flickr (disclaimer: I have a pro account there) you might want to first take a look at Zooomr (3 Os, no E).  That's a nice feature list they're putting together.

I can't find the source post for this and I hate to deep link but it's really neat.  Can a hammer really push up when it's hanging?

Genius butter cutter - Why isn't this standard kitchen equipment?

Why men are never published in Dear Abby - Quick and funny.  Don't quit in the middle.

Heat sensitive shower tiles

If computers can look so cool, why are they so ugly?

Beat box on French American Idol

It's a sort of MacGuyver search.  More suggestions from the Reddit community.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Will, I gotta disagree with you on this one: Garrison Keillor's essay was definitely anti-gay. Those of us who have been dealing with rhetoric and prejudice like his for years can spot it a mile away. He wasn't being as obvious about it as Ann Coultergeist, which is perhaps why you didn't see his true message. People like Keillor are perhaps even more dangerous than people who are as obvious as Ann Coulter. (I'm sure you know what I'm referencing to here, but I'm not going to put her hateful words here because I don't know if that kind of language is allowed on this blog). Coulter's message is clear and to the point, so obviously bigoted that only the most hard core bigots can defend her. She's laughable. Keillor's essay, and the anti-gay rhetoric within, is more subtle, and apparently some people (such as yourself), can't spot the strong undercuurent of bigotry and prejudice in his piece. That's why people like Keillor are so dangerous--he couches his homophobic message in the tired old "for the kids" routine: too many family members are bad for kids (huh?), flamboyant parents are bad for kids (huh?), and people nod their heads and agree with him about how much simpler things used to be, how much more wholesome life was in years past. What they, and you, are apparently failing to recognize, is that he places the blame squarely on GAYS (specifically gay parents) for adding to the children's already too-crowded extended family (as if there's anything wrong with a large extended family)--and in addition, who says gays are flamboyant in the first place? You say that "People are accusing Garrison Keillor of being anti-gay" in his essay, but did you actually bother to READ any of his detractors comments about it before you naively defended him? Dan Savage's blog piece about it is an excellent place to start, but I can't directly link to it because it has a swear word in the URL (and justifiably so). But if you want to know why you're wrong in your assessment of Keillor's piece, put "dan savage garrison keillor" into google search and you'll find his blog at the top.
The absurd thing about the new performer tax pushed by RIAA is that it is completely counter-productive. It will hurt new bands and smaller ones far more than the known ones, since internet radio is how many get discovered (which leads to CD or track purchases). It is even more outrageous when you consider that AM/FM radio stations do not pay this, yet they probably lead to even less sales. Internet radio and specialist channels introduce people to new bands as well as older ones they did not know about. This is an ideal marketing tool for the RIAA, yet they seem determined to kill it or at least harm its most useful function.
"share its content online audiences will watch something else online" - truthfully, new sites will come along that simply act as front-ends to many different video sources. So, you will use a "You tube" like web page to watch video that may be on You tube, a commercial site, a movie trailer site, or some other content provider. In the end, no one cares how the video is stored. The question is how much tolerance for leader ads (as Viacom and others want to go to). But, sites will be there that have tags, comments, related-video, alternative sources (of varying quality length), etc. So, the future of You Tube as a value property may be in question, although they are just as likely to be the new front-end.
Hey Will, Have you found a link to that Dolce ad that is causing such a hoopla?
Somebody warn Boston: R2D2 is NOT a BOMB.
Ron Paul, Republican candidate for president, has given support for medical marijuana http://www.marijuana.org/austinchronicle5-30-03.htm . He also has the most myspace friends of Republican candidates http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2007/02/act_blue.html . Let the pundits bat that one around for a while.
I don't know about most people, but I hate hard butter. I use a simple shallow plastic dish that has a lid. Fits half a stick and its used up long before butter even thinks about going bad, and washes up quickly too. spreadable butter ROCKS!
I read Garrison Keillor's essay this evening because I just happened to have watched "A Prairie Home Companion" today. I wouldn't say that anyone who calls it anti-gay is missing the point, because it doesn't seem to have a point. Like the movie, his essay just rambles along. It's like a prose version of stream-of-consciousness poetry. One paragraph leads to the next with just a tenuous thread of familiarity. JE seems to think that "...he places the blame squarely on GAYS (specifically gay parents) for adding to the children's already too-crowded extended family..." but that is just the extension of the previous paragraph that introduces the greatly extended families that result from a lesser commitment of monogamy today than it was in his parents' generation. And, as far as the flamboyance comments "...Parents are supposed to stand in back and not wear chartreuse pants and black polka-dot shirts. That's for the kids. It's their show..." is he wrong there? I don't think so.
The hammer doesn't "push up when its hanging." Most of the weight of the hammer is in the head, which the photo shows is under the table. It's simply balancing there, like an object in a mobile.
Bob, I see what you mean. "Pushing up" is the wrong way to think of it. The question is whether the head is far enough under the table (and with enough weight) to balance the rest. I think the angle of the camera has a lot to do with why it looks like it shouldn't work. The whole thing reminds me of those balancing wine bottle holders.

http://www.uniqueboxshop.com/flatwinbotho1.html

http://www.touchofclasscatalog.com/jump.jsp?itemID=196276&itemType=PRODUCT&iMainCat=11&iSubCat=90&iProductID=196276

http://www.bellacor.com/detail.cfm?Cat=38&ItemID=35412&partid=nextag-DataFeed

Please please legalize marijuana.
I do my own protesting against the RIAA - I buy used cds at the local halfprice bookstore and Goodwill - have found some real treasures and nobody in the "industry" makes any more money. Why buy new when all the "new" stuff is pretty much crap anyway and I can get a box set of classical for $3 at Goodwill!
Kitt has two T's in it... WHY DO I KNOW THAT?!
"Freak out" doesn't begin to describe my reaction.
Hey Will, Have you seen this guy Reggie Watts? Similar to the beat box dude, though the French guy is just, well, amazing. http://www.vimeo.com/clip:134034
Rob, I recognize that guy from when I was looking at links related to "looping." While I dig it, I also can't help but think "lonely childhood."
http://www.metacafe.com/watch/316065/strange_hammer_balance/
The old saying "Ted Kennedy has killed more people than Marijuana" pretty much sums it up. In comparison to our favorite legal drugs, cigarettes and alchol, smoking weed should be required, not outlawed. Which would the police rather do, break up a drunken and angry mob, or tell all the stoners to go on home? Please, this insidious assault on personal freedom to ensure that we only inbibe the legal drugs, is ludicris. Can you imagine, whole hordes of relaxed and non-violent people out checking the sunset? What is the country really afraid of anyway? In this day and age of prescrition drug overdoses, drunken driving deaths, and first and second hand smoke, can marijuana even be considered hazardus to our health? Hell, it's even self limiting; you forget to keep smoking long before it becomes dangerous. My solution is to quit planting tobacco in the Carolinas, and plant weed instead. We'll still get a cash crop...


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=92786