ABOUT CLICKED

The modern news consumer ignores Weblogs and online citizen journalism at his own peril. But not everyone has the time to keep track of what's going on the Web. With this blog we hope to track the highlights of what's being discussed online so when news breaks from the Web, we're ready.

Will Femia is a Weblog enthusiast who, through good fortune and dumb luck, was introduced to the form as his position as chat producer for MSNBC.com careered into obsolescence. On any given day, Will can be found having already spent an unhealthy amount of time squinting at a computer screen.

Send a message to Will at spotter@msnbc.com



That 1984 Hillary ad

Posted: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 2:33 PM by Will Femia

Bob wrote about this and others last week but for some reason it's all over TV and newspapers today.  Of course, if you're finding out about it from the TV you don't get to actually watch it for yourself so here's the link.  And here's a whole lot more on tracking the creator of the video.

UPDATE: Arianna Huffington found the guy who made it and got him to write a piece for her site.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

I really have to wonder about people who feel the ad is effective. Isn't voting for Hillary "thinking different" in light of never having a female president? I suspect its only real effectiveness lies in how polarizing a figure Hillary has always been in the first place - people who hate her, for any reason or no reason, like the ad simply because it's against her. As someone who isn't emotional in evaluating Hillary's candidacy, I see nothing in this ad that stands as a valid criticism. Put a Kennedy or Bush in there, or someone who's been in Congress for decades, or any older WASP male political stereotype, and the ad has a point. I'm not necessarily advocating voting for Hillary, but using this particular ad to advocate voting against her simply makes no sense.
I didn't particularly like the ad, but I'm not a huge Hillary fan either. I thought that the juxtaposition of her relatively non-brainwashing speech about having a dialogue with the authoritarian images of the advertisement didn't make any sense in the context in which it was supposed to presented.
I think the idea here is that we are running the risk of becoming a dynastic nation. Bush, Clinton, Bush, Clinton. In terms of being a Washington insider and a career politician, Hillary fits the bill. I don't think her being female is anything new or exciting. I realize we haven't had a female president, but I don't think it is because we supress women. Look at who has run and you can clearly see they lost because they should have lost.
That link to the tracking of the creator seems to give potentially a lot more credit to the maker of the video than I would. They hypothesize that someone in Hollywood (or with that level of knowledge) made it? Maybe. But, like most entertaining viral content, I speculate this was made by a some regular geek, who decided to play with some software (he pirated off Limewire) while he impatiently waits for new episodes of Heroes.
One and a half Senate terms does not make a "career politician." Being the wife of a career politician is not the same thing as being one yourself (see also Libby Dole). And the idea that women (and any non-WASP-male) haven't been suppressed is laughable - they're still being discouraged from even running for any office and questioned when they do. Suppression will only stop when a woman runs and _nobody_ asks "Are we ready for a female president?"


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=95622