ABOUT CLICKED

The modern news consumer ignores Weblogs and online citizen journalism at his own peril. But not everyone has the time to keep track of what's going on the Web. With this blog we hope to track the highlights of what's being discussed online so when news breaks from the Web, we're ready.

Will Femia is a Weblog enthusiast who, through good fortune and dumb luck, was introduced to the form as his position as chat producer for MSNBC.com careered into obsolescence. On any given day, Will can be found having already spent an unhealthy amount of time squinting at a computer screen.

Send a message to Will at spotter@msnbc.com



Shouting it from the rooftops

Posted: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 12:09 PM by Will Femia

I thought I'd identified a trend worth describing but the more I surf, the more I'm beginning to wonder if the trend is simply "this is what we do on the Web." You be the judge:  We pay a lot of attention to efforts at viral glory or the more controlled marketing of political causes.  And we pay a lot of attention to the stories of individuals who don't ask for attention but end up being dragged into the digital spotlight. But arguably more common are cases in which someone turns to the Web to assuage the ache of injustice in some personal drama.  People definitely have a sense that they can take their issue to the Internet to expose some bit of corruption or unfairness and sometimes it seems, for better or worse, the Internet actually listens.

What made me think about this theme is the case of a guy who believes his former roommate stole his camcorder.  He blogged about it and put up some kind of accusatory video (which was taken down before I could see it).  In the end enough people became sympathetic to his cause that the subject of his accusations began to feel threatened. Now the guy faces cyber-bullying felonies.

This guy took his bicycle on an airport road and the cops gave him a hard time. Without taking a side on this particular matter, I have to say, I'll never understand people who think it's a good idea to tell a cop they're being rude and ask for their name or their supervisor's name. That is a no-win gambit as far as I've ever seen.  There is no story that goes: "I alerted the officer to his rudeness and pointed out that his salary is paid with my taxes. He thanked me for the reminder and gave me a lights and sirens escort to my destination, tipping his had with a smile as we parted ways."

In this one, the guy behind SmartFlix is threatened by a lawyer who may be a real-life Dwight Schrute and has turned their e-mail sparring into a high-traffic blog spectacle.

This guy criticized a baggage handling company and now believes someone from that company is creating accounts in his name on gay dating sites. (P.S. While you're there, remember that Fingerwrecker clip from last week?  Check out these clips from The Legend of 1900.  That guy in the first one is meant to be Jellyroll Morton.)

Photography Banned in Downtown Silver Spring, Maryland - The focus of this story is the way authorities have tried to discourage public photography citing bogus laws and vague security reasons.  There's no denying this is taking place all over the country (lately there have been a number of stories about videotaping police) but I saw a different theme in this report. Increasingly Americans are embracing the idea of private public space - by which I mean, outdoor living space that's actually privately owned, like gated communities or those outdoor malls that feel like downtown shopping areas. It strikes me as odd that we as Americans are so passionate about our freedoms and yet we're also so open to subjecting ourselves to the extra layer of rules and restrictions of private space, whether it's a ban on photography or a limit on the number of cars you can have in your driveway or the color you can paint your house.

Speaking of outrages that kind of make sense to me, this blogger was barred from attending an Obama no-press event because he admitted to being a blogger.  Bloggers are part of the press, so the guy was rejected. As with the above examples, he brought his complaint to the online People's Court. I'm inclined to agree with the Obama people here.  It's not about whether you get a check for what you do, it's about the fact that you make a habit of reporting your experiences in a medium that could be accessed by millions.  Bloggers have spent too many years struggling to be recognized as journalists to go back down the "little old me" road now.

This guy sought to expose a problem with cars driving through a park after closing hours. In doing so he filmed himself and a concerned citizen dragging barriers into the street.  I'm thinking that's not a matter you want to take into your own hands, but if word of this video makes it to park officials I reckon he'll get the satisfaction he's looking for.

Feeling somehow similar are warnings to the same vast unspecified Web audience:

Moving on...

One thing you can expect from British Airways is that they'll get your title correct.

"A digital camera inside a parcel looks out through a small hole and captures images of its journey through the postal system."  Unfortunately it doesn't give the full video that resulted. It reminds me of the camera mail project.

This eventually made mainstream news, but in case you missed it here's a first look at Harrison Ford back as Indiana Jones. Lookin' good.

I've seen a few versions of a report of a new list of most-hated Web words. For me, silly Web 2.0 names (I cringed as I posted that link to "Glubber" recently) can end any day now.  Also start-up names that are missing vowels.  And even though I keep writing it I agree with the inclusion of "social network" on the list.

"Ceravision has just announced that they have developed a lightbulb that is 50% efficient (more than twice the efficiency of CFLs) and will last...um...forever?"

Gizmodo's copy that accompanies photos of a custom "angel sword guitar" gave me a good laugh. I hope someone told Jack Black about this item.

Human pollution filter

"Pork-Busters" Busted - An interesting essay that takes some of the wind out of the sails of the movement to cut back on Congressional earmarks. It's such an accepted bit of wisdom that the government wastes money on pork that I don't think I've ever seen anyone give the idea any critical treatment.

Iran 'unable to take Australians' - This is actually old news because it happened before Iran captured those British sailors but the revelation is new and seems potentially significant as part of the story we'll one day tell in the fallout shelter while we eat cold MREs.

Julian Beever, the greatest sidewalk artist in the world...  We see this guy's work online all the time but it's hard to tell what's new and what's old.  In this case a dated, first person description of an encounter with him is helpful.

The Future of PR is Participation, Not Pitching - I spoke as part of a panel with Steve Rubel (the aforelinked blogger) and this post feels like something he could have said back then as well.  That said, it's not any less correct or relevant.

e-learning 2.0: All You Need To Know - This is one to stick in your bookmarks and take some time to work through.  Lots of links within.

"The fact that we don’t understand what value others get from social web apps is part of the paradigm of social software. The key is that each person has their own social lives, their own social circle, and thus their own social values. What is important to their social life will almost certainly be unimportant to us because we have our own to worry about." This is the most reasonable paragraph I've read since I started keeping track of reasonable paragraphs, which admittedly started with this one. When you add to the equation the fact that so many tech writers are socially malformed, inept, or barren (not only am I including myself, I'm actually talking about myself, of course) and you get an even better sense of how "opaque" the value of some Web applications can be.

Guided tour of the new iPhone (coming Friday). Flashy, but not quite so much as the Onion had us hoping for, and no where near the promises made by Conan.

I didn't think much of the marble binary adding machine until I watched the video. Not only is it cool but it made me think about how some people -not me- are able to visualize math.

"In a recent SELF.com poll, nearly 1 in 20 respondents said their doctors had refused to treat them for moral, ethical or religious reasons." Is there some kind of quiz or something we're supposed to give our doctors to find out before-hand if they're going to hang us out to dry because their particular brand of mythology tells them to?

Sort of related: "Newly-qualified women doctors outnumber their male counterparts by almost three to two, a survey suggests."

12 of the Best Music Social Networks - This is worth paying attention to for two reasons.  The first is that it's just a matter of time before giant record labels are extinct and people learn about and promote music by digital word of mouth through these kinds of social networks.  Second, it's a great way to explore new music with a little bit of wisdom-of-the-crowds guidance.

Speaking of social music, the Last.fm normaliser is meant to build a playlist of your favorites based on how much time you spend listening to them on Last.fm.  I haven't played with it yet but the concept sounds good.

"... and ever since then my watch battery hasn't needed replacing."

Speaking of the powers of electricity, this isn't funny but I did chuckle a little at thought of the cop who must have had the surprise of his life: "Police are investigating the firey death of a man who burst into flames after dousing himself in petrol and then being shot with a taser gun."

Commuter Click: Viewing American class divisions through Facebook and MySpace

Miracle diet pill with teeny-tiny side effect - When news of the fat blocking diet pill was going around we talked about it a little here in the cube farm but used delicate workplace words to describe the effect the pill has on your... um... personal output.  This guy pulls no punches, so be forewarned, the language is a bit coarse.

Blogging Toolbox: 120+ Resources for Bloggers

Speaking of blogger tips, 10 Techniques I Used To Go From 0 To 12,000 RSS Subscribers In Seven Months - With No Ads Or Leverage

The seven most annoying things about the future - Onward is not always upward.

Yesterday I was having a discussion about whether Second Life has jumped the shark.  Coincidentally the Wall Street Journal had a recent article about interviewing for jobs in Second Life -- that is, the interview is virtual, the job is not.  You may not be able to read the article if you don't have a password but you can get a good picture of what it's about from the reactions that show up in the Techmeme list:

"For those wondering how I manage to regulate the duration of my polyphasic naps, and manage to sleep so soundly at work - I created the most invaluable mp3 I’ve ever possessed. (For those new to my site: Polyphasic sleep = not sleeping at night, but many naps throughout 24/7)" Do note the disclaimers.  I'm listening to one of the mp3s right now and it's basically a white noise hiss.  So far it's not causing me to cluck like a chicken or anything diabolical. Looks like the first one gives you 8 minutes and then wakes you up with barnyard noises and dance music.

"The Internet may be referred to as the 'information superhighway,' but a better analogy might be an enormous, hulking Tootsie Roll pop." This is more about the structure of the Internet itself, not like those maps of pundit bloggers we see sometimes.  I'm printing up the paper that's linked in the entry but I have a feeling it's going to be over my head.

In the early days of trying to figure out how to convey the television experience on the Web there was a lot of discussion of "behind the scenes" features.  As you can tell from this glimpse of Chris Matthews' excited state, sometimes behind the scenes is the best show. You can also see why those behind the scenes ideas never really turned out to be the best idea.

SimpleSpark is a search engine for finding that site that you thought could be useful but didn't have an immediate use for but then you realized you did but you'd already deleted the link from your notes.

Speaking of finding the tools you need, increasingly we are seeing sites dedicated to giving you the ability to build your own web tools without actually having the coding skills. So far I've only played with Yahoo Pipes and Microsoft's Popfly, but I'm a big fan of this idea.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

About the story of no photos allowed in public places and photographing police, this is the trend, and people better get used to it barring a major change in our thinking and actions regarding personal liberty.  The government will be allowed to peer into any aspect of your life without a reason, but citizens' ability to gather info on the government (or gather info on anything, i.e. take pictures in public) will be severely restricted.  From what I know about how our country was founded, this is the exact opposite of what the founding fathers meant.  But what do I know, maybe I have my tin foil hat on too tight.  
Dear Sir/Madam/Wg Cdr/The Very Rev/Air Vice Marshal/Senator/Alhaji/Crown Prince:
Thank you for applying for the Human Pollution Filter position we have posted via Second Life.  

Hilarious...
Will, I love your column, but that's an unnecessarily vicious swipe you took at doctors refusing to go against their own moral or religious beliefs.  Just because you think the ethical codes involved are "mythology" doesn't make it so -- nor does it make this issue any less complicated.
re: Most Hated Web Words    Long before the web, there was Usenet. Think of it as Web 0.0, where everyone who felt the urge contributed to one of 10,000+ blogs. It still exists, though not with the popularity of years past. Thanks to Google having purchased the historical backups from predecessors such as Deja Vu, and developing their Google Groups Advanced Search, we can examine the entire history of text based public human interaction. Coming in at some unknown ranking, but with about 1.16 million hits, is the word "ilk". One never hears this in verbal discourse, yet in print people seem to be unable to prevent themselves from waxing pedantic and using this word. Worse, rather than simply using it as it was intended, meaning "a kind of person", they inevitably use it with an implied but obvious negative connotation. If I, rather that Google, owned the Usenet records, I wouldn't simply make them available. I'd use it as a source to publically humiliate anyone who used this word in this way. And that, after all, is a large part of what Usenet was used for. And here you youngsters probably thought you had the patent on that, what with blogs and social networking and many of the other most hated words.
That story about the "miracle diet pill" side effect is kinda similar to the fad (past fad? Still ongoing fad?) of ingesting massive amounts of laxatives in order to lose weight. Really not much different, considering the side effects.
BTW, this statement--"Is there some kind of quiz or something we're supposed to give our doctors to find out before-hand if they're going to hang us out to try because their particular brand of mythology tells them to?" is worded PERFECTLY! (Well, except for the little typo when you wrote try instead of dry). You're sure to get a lot of lambasting from believers of the current mythology for using those words, but you're absolutely correct!
re: trucks in the driveway, color of house.  Those rules are a protection on an investment, and every homeowner agrees to them.  Buying a house is the biggest investment most Americans will ever make, and it only takes a few bad neighbors with ou of control weeds, broken down old cars and piles of trash to lower the property value, and in turn the resale value.

Very different from taking pictures on the sidewalk.
Steve, thanks for posting the exact comment I would have made if you hadn't.  I was very surprised (and disappointed) that Will would make such a comment. Mythology?  Good grief.
I don't know how to feel about the cyclist and the cop story. If (big if) the cops did what he claims they should be pretty severely disciplined, but I can't shake the feeling the guy is one of those people almost anyone would want to taze. Not to mention the cop was ultimately right, the road WAS off limits... what was he supposed to do, drive back uproot the sign and deliver it to the cyclist?
In a perfect world, authority figures would never abuse their authority or overstep their bounds.  Unfortunately, policemen are human beings.  It's hard to imagine anyone not getting fed up with the smarmy, self righteous BS that was undoubtedly being spewed by the cycle rider.  Finally, when told to drop to his knees, to comment "that's absurd" and begin to pedal away invites the treatment he ultimately suffered.

Did the policeman overreact?  Quite possibly.  Did the cyclist bring his treatment upon himself?  Definitely.  I'm afraid he may be in for a rude awakening if he elects to take his friends' advice and bring suit.  There may be a majority of jurors in his case just like me.  He'll be sadly out of luck.
Steve and Mike, that's easy for you to say when you share the beliefs of the doctor in the story, but the point is that you have a certain expectation of care when you go to a doctor.  You expect he's going to treat you according to the science of medicine.  If he's not (or she's not) then there ought to be a way to know.  Maybe doctors should advertise themselves as Christian doctors or Muslim doctors or Scientologist doctors.  If they don't, I don't want to go through a whole round of diagnosis only to have the doctor not tell me what's going to cure me but instead tell me what's going to keep with square with his god.

Obviously a doctor works within some guidelines.  You're not allowed to go kill someone and harvest their kidney just because you need a kidney.  But that's different from a doctor not offering a kidney transplant as an option because he doesn't believe transplants are sanctioned by God.

I don't even mind applying religious beliefs on top of regular medicine. If you want to add prayer or ceremonies or whatever, that's great.  There's all kinds of proof of the power of the mind over our well-being, so it makes sense to apply medicine in a comfortable psychological context.
Chris, I don't disagree with you.  In fact, most of these privatizing situations are about protecting a certain quality of life or property value.  I'm sure there's even a keeping-out-the-riff-raff justification for banning photography in some cases. But it's a funny admission that freedom isn't all it's cracked up to be when it means having a jerky neighbor with a messy yard or a shopping area full of obnoxious kids.
I don't think Will's "mythology" comment was a "vicious swipe" at anybody.  These "moral" decisions on the part of practitioners can be life-threatening to affected patients, and a "myth" is simply an unproven belief in something.  I'm perfectly fine with my religion being called mythology - the point of faith is that you believe without proof.  And those doctors are being ridiculous to even practice a specialty that has a medical standard of care they aren't comfortable with.  Lawyers are taught that if they can't handle the idea of protecting Constitutional rights above the idea of defending a guilty person, then they shouldn't become criminal defense lawyers.  It's the same concept across all professions - if your conscience prevents you from being able to practice according to the accepted standards of a given profession, you should not be a part of that profession.
So the ancient Greek religion, or Roman, they were mythologies, even though they were believed fervently by their followers, but modern day religions are not?  Please, get over yourselves.
In the business of law enforcement persons confronting a cop are usually guilty of POPO (pissing off a police officer).  A common phrase used in police reports in these situations is "Defendant did fall..."
I respectfully disagree with you on the cyclist story.  The thing that got my goat the most was that the older cop got the trainee to tase the bike guy.  He must be familiar with the Milgram experiment!  Cops need to be taken to task for these incidents and then fined personally.  We must resist the current wave of authoratarianism on all fronts.

On the other handm, your use of mythology is so appropriate.  Glad to see that you can differentiate religious codes from ethical codes unlike other commenters.  I wonder if Pastafarian doctors are in my HMO?
"I'm inclined to agree with the Obama people here."  That's probably because you agree to some extent with the political leanings of the Obama campaign.  Otherwise I bet you wouldn't agree.  My guess is that Obama is trying to prevent a "macaca" moment during an event with members of his base.  That means the Obama campaign is uncomfortable with the freedom and spontaneity of the Web 2.0 world.
BC, you're my favorite troll.  The idea that I have to agree with Obama on anything in order to agree that bloggers are the same as the press doesn't even warrant a response.  I do like the point of your last sentence, maybe because, as I mentioned in this entry, we spent so much time evaluating whether total transparency was a good idea for TV production.
About these doctors refusing to do things because of their "mythologies" - I'm 46, single, diabetic  w/ "female problems" whose doctors won't help me take care of the problem because they insist on "preserving my fertility" - so what if I'm in pain, they're making sure I can have children!  Hey, docs, if I'm 46 and still haven't had kids - news flash - I AIN'T GONNA!!
I sense an insurance company, more than a Holy Book, is behind Viv's docs' interest in "preserving her fertility." But that opens up a question. in pursuing a lawsuit, may a lawyer invoke a community's Holy Book while attempting to sway a jury?
I agree with you Will about the doctors. However, it goes beyond moral beliefs. I just read where a poll of doctors revealed that somewhere near 75% of them said that they would not tell a man that he was not the father of his children if they discovered the "paternal discrepancy". Although typically not as urgent as a trip to the ER, that is a form of sub-standard treatment since it can affect future treatment of the child and could even affect a child's decision about having children themselves.

I couldn't find the article I read, but here is a Men's Health article that deals with the subject of PD:

 http://www.menshealth.com/cda/article.do?site=MensHealth&channel=guy.wisdom&category=family.guy&conitem=8a37302052421110VgnVCM10000013281eac____&cm_mmc=Mag_URL-_-2007_April-_-Are_You_Raising_Another_Mans_Child

Ok, I'm going to weigh in on this.  As far as I'm concerned, Will, you have thumbed you nose at believers by your "mythology" comment.  You're entitled to do that, but you now seem to be putting yourself in the, self-righteous, emboldened, in-your-face, Hitchens/Harris/Dawkins camp.  This definitely puts an ideological spin on you column that I otherwise perceived as making interesting observations on trends in cyberspace.  I also think your comment is wrong.  It is possible that some doctors may be opposed to abortion for ethical rather than religious reasons.
Do you think Chris Matthews was referring to having Ann Coulter on the show?
actually the insurance company had already approved it - it was the doctor who refused to follow through
"Is there some kind of quiz or something we're supposed to give our doctors to find out before-hand if they're going to hang us out to dry because their particular brand of mythology tells them to?"

Couldn't have said it better myself.
While I agree with the overall point you were trying to make, I also have to wonder about your use of the word "mythology."  I guess it could be seen as less inflammatory since you include moral and ethical ideas and don't only mention religious beliefs, but I find it hard to believe an experienced writer and blogger like yourself didn't see the firestorm coming when you wrote that.  Considering you could have just as easily made your point using words like "credo", it strikes me as a deliberate attempt to get some people riled up, for whatever reason you might have had.
I would point out that some prominent Christians (J.R.R. Tolkien, C.S. Lewis) viewed all religions as mythologies, however they believed that the Christian religion was the "one, true, mythology" and that all other mythologies that mirrored the Christian one were incomplete versions of the true religion.  So, mythology was a very appropriate term to use there and should not be seen as an insult.
Re the latest diet pill: if it is used correctly (no more than 15 grams of fat per meal), the side effects are very minor.  The only people with real issues with it are the ones who try to eat anything they want.  The diet itself would be effective without the pills; they just give you an extra insentive to limit your fat intake.
Viv, slap that doc in the face and go find another one!

How fucking dare they tell you that!?  Oh man, I'm freakin' furious and I don't even know you.

If you can't see another doc due to travel times and insurance restrictions, tell them you don't care about fertility.  If they still won't do what you like, get a lawyer.



Will,
 I would agree with your comment on doctors, but I would not limit it to religion.  Another posting referred to the "current mythology" which I would hope includes political correctness.  A significant number of doctors are quite arrogant (and to some minor extent it's their privilege as most of the people they deal with every day are inept by comparison).  From my limited dealings with them I have found that, when present, this arrogance manifests itself with whatever other beliefs they may have, be they religious, political, etc.  Their a lot like computer geeks in this way, only that women find them sexier for some reason...;)
Ben, in the first post. You are not supposed to think for youself, that shows you do not support the government.
And I applaud you for it.
Please check you brain at the door.
WDRussell - thanks.

:D~
(that's me grinning and drooling after having left my brain at the door.  Someone else typed this for me.)
Just got back from Vacation, and of course the first thing I do is check in on Clicked... looks like I missed a good one.

And BTW, When did you go BLOG-MA?  Or did the profanity in Sean's post slip by somehow?


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=235680