Follow-up links to that McCain story
Posted: Friday, February 22, 2008 7:04 PM by Will Femia
Some follow-up links for those of you who've been interested in the McCain story from the NY Times:
Here
the Times answers readers' questions about what they were thinking in publishing the story. I still can't decide if I think they were foolish for not anticipating the reaction the story got. That's been the most interesting question for me through this. The story is about how a man whose public image is based on his reputation plays fast and loose with that reputation and how it freaks out his aids. Should the Times have known that the cable news echelon of our media class would relay it as "The Times says McCain had an affair and did favors for this attractive woman." Surely we can agree that anticipated reaction should not alter an organization's news judgment, but maybe the story should have been presented differently? Remember a few years ago when a member of Congress used the word "niggardly" and everyone went crazy with condemnation before they actually bothered to look up the word to find out that it has nothing to do with the forbidden n-word? How much of that did the member of Congress bring on himself by using that word in the first place?
Correcting: It wasn't a member of Congress, it was
a local official. Interesting
recent history of that word.
This is
the New Republic piece that
supposedly forced the Times to print the story before they were really ready.
Why the Seattle PI
didn't run the story when it came up in the feed.