ABOUT CLICKED

The modern news consumer ignores Weblogs and online citizen journalism at his own peril. But not everyone has the time to keep track of what's going on the Web. With this blog we hope to track the highlights of what's being discussed online so when news breaks from the Web, we're ready.

Will Femia is a Weblog enthusiast who, through good fortune and dumb luck, was introduced to the form as his position as chat producer for MSNBC.com careered into obsolescence. On any given day, Will can be found having already spent an unhealthy amount of time squinting at a computer screen.

Send a message to Will at spotter@msnbc.com



Queen of the clickstream

Posted: Friday, March 21, 2008 5:49 PM by Will Femia

Remember Qik? It lets you stream live from the camera on your mobile device to a Web site they host for you. Last month I met NBC cameraman/blogger/DIY media person Jim Long who mentioned using Qik and Twitter to shoot a live interview with Bob Geldof while in Africa with the Today show's Ann Curry. Through Twitter he was able to see messages from the audience on the back of his phone while the camera on the front of his phone was shooting interview being shown live around the world. That is both cool and tight, but now Flixwagon may do it better by combining those functionalities into a single service. Broadcast live from your phone, see comments, save your broadcast, upload to YouTube... all in one service. I haven't tried it yet but that's a lot of cool functionality. Handy summary here.

Speaking of streams, apparently MyBlogLog does lifestreaming like FriendFeed does - sharing your online activity in what I can only describe as a Web log. Not only that, but through tags they regroup all of their lifestreams into categories. On the way to the Semantic Web this (topics pages) seems like a popular idea.

Speaking of taking content from a source and putting it in a new page to do new things, some Clicked readers may recall my complaint that link sharing on the Web has migrated from blogs to other formats, making it more difficult to follow Web trends through blog aggregators.  A similar situation is happening with online conversations. A blog item may draw no comments itself but its placement in Digg, Reddit, StumbleUpon, etc may draw plenty of discussion(s). And then there's what's said on Twitter and through Facebook notes. Sadly, the list of solutions to the problem of finding out what people are saying about your blog is no less overwhelming.

But while it may be challenging to track every bit of conversations about your particular blog entry, actual inter-site online discourse is doing quite well.  This week saw Mike Arrington speculate about the power that could be wielded by a unified organization of A-list bloggers, followed by a battery of interesting replies.

Other worthwhile reading this week was this somewhat lengthy explanation of the debate over Web standards. It sounds wonky but read as far as you're able and you're bound to come away with some new insight about (and appreciation for) how the Web is structured.

"This is what the world's first Time Machine may look like."

"A German pensioner is taking a hospital to court after she turned up for a leg operation - and got a new anus instead." A headline contest item if ever there was one.

Here's another one of those extended clips of Reverend Wright. As a non-churchgoer I may not be qualified to judge but the characterization of his services as being some kind of indoctrination does seem right. Listening to this guy is more like a mental exercise.

File Dropper has a 5 gig limit and it's free. You upload a file to it, it gives you a link, you pass the link to someone else and they download the file you put in there. This could be the answer to the bowling pictures problem I mentioned earlier.

The Wall Street Journal's Web site is already (secretly) free - This may be a bit longer than you want to read if you're not specifically looking for the answer to WSJ's pay wall but the Firefox trick at the end is interesting. The idea is that while you can't get all of the WSJ for free, you can get at it if you're coming from Google News or Digg and maybe some other sites. So WSJ is reading what site is referring you to them and decides from there whether you should be allowed to read the article. The Firefox trick is to use a "referrer spoofer." You tell it what to tell the WSJ about who sent you.

I got some referral traffic from this cool Flickr tag browser and ended up losing a significant amount of time exploring links on the blog and poking through his portfolio links.

The fruit of that labor includes "Add to friends" gear that displays a bar code (or whatever you call that) that can be photographed and sent to Facebook to add you as a friend. My first thought was that it would be cool to have this as a business card and have it feed something more general-purpose than a Facebook page. Then my mind wandered to the thought that a tattoo would save the trouble of having to carry a card... Boy, that was a slippery slope.

Somehow following that I ended up with Sub-Studio on my screen and enjoyed the list of weird shoe photos down the left side there.

The peace sign turned 50 yesterday. I had heard that its roots were in semaphore but I thought that was just urban legend.

Even though it seems like every card trick calls itself the best card trick, this one really is pretty good. Unfortunately no reveal here. I notice he shuffles off the top, which is usually a sign that the bottom card is a marker but that doesn't answer half the questions this trick leaves.

Listening: Hot French rockers Neimo. I confess I listened to it with the window minimized but I think it's all safe for work. The video is of two people having sex but any exposed flesh is transparent so it's just clothes moving around. Some of it is pretty flagrant but still, no actual boobies.

Rock climbing robots (with video) - I generally think of rock climbing as a challenge rooted in the limitations of human physicality. To the extent that robot designers work from scratch, I'm surprised they'd follow the human climbing model so closely.

I should know better than to see a trend in a single instance but this photo is just too great and this photoshopping too funny for this to be the last we see of it.

In case you doubted the effects of global warming, this is probably the surest sign yet.

In the wake of my tap water rant: Salmonella outbreak linked to tap water - I forgot to mention that my new theory is not that the tap water stories are a bottled water conspiracy but that the shift to bottled water has led to neglect of the quality of tap water. So sort of a passive conspiracy theory.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Spoiler Alert?

I think the deck starts out with a red 5 of clubs (5C) and then blue 5C on the bottom (red above blue).  He maintains this order, sets the 8D beneath the blue 5C (thru the shuffling-off-the-top trick), then gets the blue card on top of the deck (now the red 5C should be on the bottom).  He flips over the blue card and the 8D simultaneously, then he sets the blue card off to the side, shuffles off the top again to end up showing a red 5C, which was the next-to-the-bottom card, and then shows that the blue card is also a 5C.  Still very cool!
The card trick is easy to decipher.

The bottom card is always a blue 5s. When he fans the deck at the beginning, he makes sure not to reveal the blue card (very imporant to do this fan correctly.)

The blue card is now the marker, and is always on the bottom and is always the 5s. The type of shuffle is vital; he top shuffles to keep the blue 5s always on bottom. When the "mark" says stop, the magician places the card the mark chose (8d) into the pile, and places the blue 5s on top of it.

Now for a bit of slight of hand; watch closely as he reveals the allegedly blue-backed 8d; in fact, he's turning over 2 cards, both the blue 5s and the 8d under it. This reveals the 8d under, but not the 5s, and NOT the blue back of the 8d (because it's never blue, it's always red).

He then turns both cards back over. This is the illusion: When he shows you the 8d, he makes sure you never ever get to see its back (because the back of the 8d is always red).

Now, he places what you THINK is the 8d (but in reality was always the 5s) aside and does the trick again (allegedly). This part of the trick is just a feint. There's no sleight of hand at this point, as the blue 5s is already sitting out there, waiting for the magician to turn it over and amaze you.

Cheers,
The Amazing Kevin
The card trick is simple.  During all shuffles he never upsets the bottom of the deck.  On the bottom is the blue 5 of spades. Right on top of that is the red 5 of spades.  A card is picked, placed in the deck right below the blue 5 of spades.  When he puts the blue card on top, the chosen card is right under it, and he flips over both cards to reveal the chosen card.  He then removes the blue card from the deck, shows the bottom card, the red 5 of spades, spreads the deck out and aha, no blue card.  He then reveals the ommitted blue card which has not so very magically turned into the blue 5 of spades.
The pictures of the LHC are mind-blowing, but the link discussing the risks of it creating micro black holes is fascinating, too.  I don't know much about black holes, but I am pretty sure we don't want even little ones collecting at the center of the earth!

http://www.risk-evaluation-forum.org/anon1.htm
In the case of Wright preaching one or more of the talking heads on TV Sunday said "look at the congregation".  Yep, they look bored. The commentator was essentially saying that this stuff is old fashioned and old hat.  


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=795448