ABOUT CLICKED

The modern news consumer ignores Weblogs and online citizen journalism at his own peril. But not everyone has the time to keep track of what's going on the Web. With this blog we hope to track the highlights of what's being discussed online so when news breaks from the Web, we're ready.

Will Femia is a Weblog enthusiast who, through good fortune and dumb luck, was introduced to the form as his position as chat producer for MSNBC.com careered into obsolescence. On any given day, Will can be found having already spent an unhealthy amount of time squinting at a computer screen.

Send a message to Will at spotter@msnbc.com



No justice like Web justice

Posted: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 11:33 AM by Will Femia

"There’s really no justice quite like internet justice." The short version of this one is that a thief stole a gamer's Xbox, laptop and TV. The gamer was using a new Xbox when someone sent him a message offering to sell his stolen Xbox back to him. The gamer put the messager's Xbox account and the story on Digg and from there every bit of information about the person who sent the message, short of his DNA sequence, was researched and published on a wiki. His every point of social Web contact was harassed and ridiculed. They even called his mom.

The laptop was eventually returned. Looks like the Xbox also eventually made its way home too. I see a note there asking that the wiki be taken down so that may soon be a dead link. The victim is now trying to get un-famous. The story is made a little confusing because the stolen Xbox was sold and it was the purchaser who contacted the victim. The "internet justice" was not particularly discriminating about that detail. The whole thing is covered well here and here.

Picmatic seems like a great service but I'm not sure how they manage to do it. You upload an unlimited number of photos (under 3Mb each) and they host them, offer you links to embed the ones under 300kb and give you a permanent eternal link to them so you can share the gallery. And there are no ads. My only question is, what's in it for them?

Project Prostitute - Draw what you think a prostitute looks like. These aren't fancy artists or anything. They're mostly pretty feeble drawings. I'm not sure I find as much insight in them as others do. Maybe if we could see some information about the artists it would mean a little more to me.

Quotably is a new service that's potentially useful if you want to make more of Twitter but don't have a sense of the environment there. You'll recall TweetScan lets you search for a term to see what people are Tweeting about it. Quotably lets you search for a person to see all the conversations they're in. Let's take Robert Scoble as an example since I know he's an avid Twitter user. Looking at all of Scoble's conversations gives me that sinking "I'm missing out on the party" feeling.

ADDING: Hey, waddaya know, on his blog Scoble explores "The secret to Twitter."  (His secret is to follow a lot of people. "The more people I follow, the smarter I get, the more connected I get, the better the experiences I have in life." I still struggle to get past the idea that following someone on Twitter is like eavesdropping on their IM conversations but I'm working on building a better "follow" list.

Speaking of following online conversations, "Well, the buzz of the weekend seems to be around a New York Times op-ed by musician Billy Bragg upset about the sale of Bebo to AOL earlier this month. ... Because musicians chose to put their music on Bebo and that helped attract users, don't they deserve some of the $850 million that Bebo got from AOL." My opinion is closer to this blogger's than to Bragg's. It reminds me of the Flickr question we've talked about before. I accept a certain amount of rip-off as part of using the tool because the value Flickr's community and functionality provides is worth it. Same with Bebo or other social networks. The point of Web tools is that you want to make use of every advantage you can. If you can promote your music through a social network, way to go; more power to you.

The idea of tagging everything you own with RFID is a little creepy and probably not worth it just to pull off the cool trick of making your robot purse happy. Then again, for people of a certain age prone to forgetting things, the utility would definitely outweigh the creepiness. Someone's probably already thought of this, but it'd be neat if food packaging was tagged so that items not in the refrigerator would show up on a screen on the fridge or pantry door, essentially writing your grocery shopping list. Tagging the food would make check-out easier too. No scanning, just roll your cart near the sensor.

Note to self: Check out Talk2MyShirt the wearable electronics blog.

Mark Glaser's new Mediashift column is about the mayhem that is the mobile Web. I don't understand how it came to be that Web sites have to jump through hoops to get their content to work on a phone. Why isn't it incumbent on the phone makers to use a browser that can render for the phone's display? I guess now that the iPhone is essentially that we may see some of the responsibility shift. Glaser doesn't really mention a mobile browser war but that seems like the best way to a good solution.

Saturday was World Pillow Fight Day. There's some debate over whether the event is too messy or otherwise ecologically inconvenient but I'm mostly impressed that it was a genuinely world wide event. (There is no better photographic exercise than events like this.)

I wasn't familiar with Muckety before yesterday. They produce relationship charts to illustrate news stories. You need Java for them to render. They're pretty useful (or at least fun) in their initial state but if you click the bubbles to expand the relationships it quickly turns into a huge mess. A neat idea regardless.

Watch every episode of South Park online free. At least some of them are uncensored too which means F bombs are clearly heard. They're also hosting embeddable clips. Even if you don't care about South Park there's a potentially valuable answer that could come from this site. Will pirating of shows and YouTubing of clips diminish now that there's a legitimate, free, high quality source?

Scientists attached a camera to an elephant and sent him to roam around in the wild. I'm having a real hard time believing the elephant got such good shots.

Speaking of taking pictures, The Ten Tastiest Food Photography Tips - I almost never take pictures of food because they always look terrible. The color is always off or it's too shiny.
My best effort and still pretty weak:
The Kasjan Bakery raspberry doughnut

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

I work in food marketing and photography, and our photographer would die if he read those tips. There's so much more to it.
Will,

RFID is a glorified, expensive mess... Walmart led the way, and it hasn't quite been the solution they thought it would be to improve their supply chain. Because of their action, the DOD jumped on board and is requiring many manufacturers to bear the cost of shipping RFID, which is costly and confusing... I'd hate to see RFID become a part of identification or debit/credit cards because then someone can hack/hide a small portable reader, hide it near a check out stand, collect the data later and presto... good ole fashion ID/money theft... ugh... plus those small tags are susceptible to damage during shipping just as a paper label would be...
The picture of the "confection" actually looks like you've wounded some sort of animal.
The Elephant-cam...wow.  Great pictures, and I'm inclined to believe that they're real, since animals tend to be much more relaxed when the human element is taken out of the equation of observing them.  Also, this isn't the first time that shots like this have been featured - I remember watching a great ocean documentary a couple of years ago (can't remember the title, sorry) where marine biologists attached very small "critter-cam"s to great white sharks & got phenomenal footage of the sharks interacting with other sharks, hunting, etc.

BTW, speaking of animals, it's obvious that no-one in Canada has seen "Caddyshack":
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23793136/

Oh, mister gopher...
Here's how to make that shot better (try it this way, and show another photo with the results!)

1) Your angle is too high. You need to be at the food's level.

2) Depth of field! Everything in the background should be out of focus. Even the back of the plate. It should look like almost the entire photo is out of focus except the very middle of the food.

3) Lighting. Your lighting is at a funky angle and too low, producing lots of shadowing on your food. In this case, three steps to the left would have helped (of course, you'd need to spin the plate to keep the same point of reference.)

4) The plate looks dirty. Clean it! (It's not actually dirty, just gummed up from when you cut the pastry. The bumpy tablecloth is distracting. Get that chair out of the background. Anything that takes the eye away from the subject should be eliminated.

5) The food is "dirty." Not really dirty, but it looks like a bloddy stump, if you get my drift. Take a knife, and recut the pastry to eliminate the red splotches on the cake part and the drolling red blood. This particular pastry needs to be cleanly cut to look good, else it looks like an arm has been severed.

5) If you happen to have a blowtorch handy ... melt the gooey sugar stuff on top that's flaking. You want that melting over the pastry and dripping down the side.

I'd love to see you try again with what you've learned.
That's so strange. Last weekend our car was broken into. My laptop was one of the things taken. I had a service called "Logmein" on the laptop and today I was able to use it to log into my stolen laptop and wipe out all my information. All my passwords, all the private information and documents, all the photos and video's of family. Everything. It would have been sweeter to track the guy down like the xbox story, but if this is the only thing I have, I'm happy with that.
Will,
I think that the secret to really cutting down on piracy  (of tv shows and movies, though not songs unfortunately) is for the networks to put the broadcast on their websites free of charge.  They can embed commercials that can't be skipped.  I have watched many episodes of Friday Night Lights on NBC.com and if they would put up whole episodes of SNL, I would watch that too.  It's cheaper than the $2-$3 these episodes would cost on iTunes, and it is legal.  If there were a way to embed the commercials and make it very hard to remove them, I don't see why the shows couldn't be downloadable also.  

The biggest problem I have about networks crying over piracy (on YouTube especially) is that not all tv shows are available, anywhere.  If all the Daily Show episodes were available on comedycentral.com, I'd watch them, even with commercials.  If Family Guy were on fox's website, I'd watch them there.  I don't think the networks understand this.  Unfortunately, it won't really work with songs because listeners are not used to commercials with their songs.  Still, if songs were available to listen on a website with ad banners or something, that might work a little.  Still have the issue of most people wanting/needing to download their music.  

I do think that Napster, Firefox, OpenOffice, and GIMP (among others) have made all of us think we somehow deserve programs and media for free and that's a genie that isn't going back in the bottle.
Oh Will...it looks like your cake has been shot and might need medical attention
Careful what you blog or you might start getting regular pictures of food from me!
Kevin, thanks, it'll have to wait for the weekend, that's from my local shop so I need the set up time at home.
if your food photos are too shiny, it's likely from direct flash.

try a softbox, soft front light

then soft light from all around.

general rule: the soft light should be three times as wide as the subject.



for colors, set the camera off of auto-white-balance, instead use fixed flash white-balance.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=804583