ABOUT CLICKED

The modern news consumer ignores Weblogs and online citizen journalism at his own peril. But not everyone has the time to keep track of what's going on the Web. With this blog we hope to track the highlights of what's being discussed online so when news breaks from the Web, we're ready.

Will Femia is a Weblog enthusiast who, through good fortune and dumb luck, was introduced to the form as his position as chat producer for MSNBC.com careered into obsolescence. On any given day, Will can be found having already spent an unhealthy amount of time squinting at a computer screen.

Send a message to Will at spotter@msnbc.com



That Harry Potter fan site at the root of J.K. Rowling's lawsuit

Posted: Monday, April 14, 2008 4:51 PM by Will Femia
Filed Under:

The Harry Potter Lexicon is the fan site full of Harry Potter words. The lawsuit is over a book version of the site planned for publication. In a nutshell, Rowling says it's theft of her ideas, the publisher says it's a legitimate guidebook to complicated material. Personally, I'm surprised Rowling's publisher hasn't already been churning out related reference material to the series. There's a lot of milk in that cash cow.

I don't know about you but seeing a collection of trivia makes me think contests. So Harry Potter fans (and people who know how to perform a Web search), what modification did Arthur Weasley make to Hagrid's flying motorbike? (Yes, I know it was Seirious Black's bike, but you know what I mean.)

The first person to give me that answer wins an MSNBC logo version of the thing Hagrid hid his wand in. As a bonus, if you can name the celebrity who interrupted my interview with Robbie Coltrane when he was doing publicity for the first Harry Potter movie, I'll give you little beeping cube with LEDs that flash when you tap it. (I think it's meant to be a digital die.")

As for last week's contest, the winners are John who sent the Blackarachnia answer, David who sent the V'ger answer and Greg who sent the "I, Mudd" answer. I was going to do just the first right answer but these were the first of their kind and I happen to have three mugs here cluttering up my desk.

Congrats guys, I'm going to send you an e-mail asking for your mailing address. I'm hoping you all put valid e-mail addresses in your comments. If not, get in touch.

Oops, I forgot the photo:

Thank you Vanna.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

The modification was a dragon-fire button.
Well I don't think it says specifically what enchantment Mr. Weasley used in the books. However, I'd imagine he used an enchantment similar to the one he placed on the flying car.

So my guess would have to be an enchantment similar to that of Wingardium Leviosa.
are we supposed to post a reply? my answer is... The sidecar for harry to ride in?
Merely wishing to point out that it's Sirius Black, like the brightest star in the night sky, not 'serious'.
Arthur Weasley had helped Hagrid make several adjustments to the bike, including a button that produced dragon's fire, one that produced a net, and another that produced a solid wall, all behind the bike.

Bonus: Dan Akroyd
It's Sirius Black
Arthur Weasley made the modifications to the bike more suitable for protection. So he made them more defensive modifications which harry uses later on.

The name of the celebrity who interrupted you in the interview with Robbie Coltrane was Dan Akroyd.

Arthur Weasley made the modifications to the bike more suitable for protection. So he made them more defensive modifications which harry uses later on.

The name of the celebrity who interrupted you in the interview with Robbie Coltrane was Dan Akroyd.

There's probably comments not approved that have this down already, but according to my Potter-fan daughter the motorocycle (motorbike) was made to breathe or cast dragon-fire.  
Oh, and you were interrupted by Dan Ackroyd, I believe.  I hope I win the flashing die!  I need more desk toys =)
The bike modifications were buttons that let the bike create a wall and a net in the air behind it as a defensive measure, and another one that shot dragon fire out the back as a type of magical nitrous to boost the bike to a much greater speed
Arthur Weasley added three buttons to the bike. One shoots a brick wall behind the bike. Another shoots out a net. The third shoots flames from the exhaust pipe.
Dan Akroyd is the one who popped in on the Robbie Coltrane interview.
um, you misspelled forgot in the "Oops, I fogot the photo:" Thanks for the link!
Weasley equipped the bike with a button capable of shooting dragon fire out of the exhaust pipe. Dan Akroyd interupted your interview.  
It's Sirius Black! (not Serious)  Better read a couple of the books!
He put spells so that with a push of a button differnet thing came out the back- such as a brick wall, a net, and dragon fire. rodneyskip @ gmail.com
SERIOUS Black???  Seriously?

Siriusly?
He enabled Hagrid's Motorcycle to shoot various things behind it; a net, flames, or a wall.
Oh, and Dan Akroyd is who interrupted you during your Robbi Coltrane interview
Hagrid hid his wand in an umbrella (Brits call it a brolly).  No idea on the drop-in celebrity, though!
Its the dragon fire button.  And its Sirius Black.
Was it a sidecar?
Author Weasley modified Hagrid motorcycle with defensive measures activated with buttons installed
- a magical aftermarket addition, if you will
Defensive Mechanisms
The side car?
I believe he added various buttons that made a few magical traps for followers such as a brick wall, a net, and some nasty fire
My My My, people are awfully touchy about a simple spelling mistake and a typo or two aren't they?? WTF?

And where did all these ppl come from anyway, did they get directed from somewhere??  

I hope an actual clicked regular wins the prize!
so who is the winner?
The real problem here is the attempt to extend IP rights well beyond any reasonable limit.  Guides to things/literary systems have been fair use for years.  There is legitimate scholarship that needs to have ancillary materials.  

Beyond the tiny genre of companion books, the real risk is to literary criticism.  It the stance is maintained that a mention of a work or a connection to it counts as appropriation then writing critical books becomes impossible, as even the gain ascertained by critique becomes articulated inexorably to the original source.  

Remember when Diebold started sending trademark violation letters to skeptical journalists?  What does it mean for a democracy much less a robust business world when we put everything in a museum the second it is complete?  

Disney might love the genre of the instant classic, but the way we police the museum makes for a terrible future.
There are other examples of stuff like this. Star wars and Star Trek are two that immediately come to mind. I don't think others' use of the original concept to launch other aspects of them has hurt either one.
What we have here is a bruising of her ego.
"Personally, I'm surprised Rowling's publisher hasn't already been churning out related reference material to the series. There's a lot of milk in that cash cow."

That's what I think this is *really* about.  I think Rowling's publisher wanted to do this and got scooped.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=889595