ABOUT CLICKED

The modern news consumer ignores Weblogs and online citizen journalism at his own peril. But not everyone has the time to keep track of what's going on the Web. With this blog we hope to track the highlights of what's being discussed online so when news breaks from the Web, we're ready.

Will Femia is a Weblog enthusiast who, through good fortune and dumb luck, was introduced to the form as his position as chat producer for MSNBC.com careered into obsolescence. On any given day, Will can be found having already spent an unhealthy amount of time squinting at a computer screen.

Send a message to Will at spotter@msnbc.com



The nerds giveth and the nerds taketh away

Posted: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 1:07 AM by Will Femia

It was nearly one of those heartwarming stories of the cooperation of an online community bring two people together. This fellow used photos of himself holding signs to ask a girl to prom and asked Digg to raise the profile of his offer so she'd see it. Thousands supported his cause, elevating it to the front page of the popular social site. But no answer was forthcoming. A clue on the suspected profile of the girl in question has led some to suspect that she had already turned him down once. The same fellow was later beseeching the community to take back what had been done, apparently at the request of the object of his affection (whose name, address, Facebook and more were eventually revealed in the thread of hundreds of comments).

Tech nerds may be impressed by the power and enthusiasm of instant viral digital mobs - especially ones as skilled and savvy as the Digg community - but teenage potential prom dates, perhaps not so much. The lesson for our well-meaning Romeo: with great power comes great responsibility.

Speaking of the power of the lovin', I'm still trying to make sense of this page on which a woman named Tania Derveaux offers to have sex with every virgin (male, I guess) who defends the Internet by tangibly supporting net neutrality. Apparently she was also involved in some kind of political ad in which she offered oral sex to tens of thousands in exchange for their vote. The joke was a play on the more traditional political promise of "jobs." Given that, I'm wondering if the joke with the virginity offer has to do with how screwed the average Web user is if net neutrality is outlawed.  NOTE: No nudity but she's naked from the waist up holding a relatively small sign, covering her dangerous bits with her arm.

Speaking of nerd love, Nerd rings. Pretty impractical. I like the idea of rings that fit Wonder Twins style though. I'll have to think if there's a more subtle connector.

A smart man compares the local TV weather forecasts with the actual weather conditions as recorded by his school-age daughter. Care to guess the result? The most laughable part is that no forecaster in the study was better (or much better) than simply assuming it won't rain, no matter what. Maybe this is all an unfair challenge but I've always thought the weather report should include a look back at whether the previous forecasting had actually been accurate. Instead of bragging about the size of one's Doppler, how about bragging about the accuracy of one's record. Why does no newscast advertise itself as "the most accurate weather reporting in the area"? (One point I have to concede is that when a station has a wide broadcast radius they can sometimes be dealing with a wide range of weather conditions depending on where their viewers live. It's definitely the case that I get different weather in Brooklyn than the folks in northern New Jersey even though we're both served by the local WNBC station's weather so who are they talking to when they say it's going to rain tomorrow?)

New Nokia ad uses a familiar video technique to cool effect. In the middle is a Breakout video game.

Surgeons give hope to blind with successful 'bionic eye' operations - No Geordi stuff yet but still cool that it's real.

Uncartooning Jessica Rabbit - I don't know if anyone even knows who Jessica Rabbit is anymore but the point is that photographic human textures were added to a cartoon to give it a weird real-but-obviously-not quality. Don't miss the Homer rendering. There's also a video showing in time lapse how it was done, basically using elements of Angelina Jolie and other actresses.

Speaking of photo manipulation, The Impossible Art of Li Wei. That's a bit of a link jack but the actual artist site is hard to navigate.

It would definitely never occur to me that a sports car might perform better with six wheels.

Download the new Gnarls Barkley for free... um... and backward. (But if you bothered to download that Audacity program I mentioned I've been using to produce the Voices in my Head series, it has a "reverse" effect that basically puts it forward again.)

Speaking of free albums, the new Portishead can be heard as a free stream on Last FM. NOTE: Autoplay. Volume check first.

Speaking of free stuff online, I put in today for free access to the online version of the encyclopedia Britannica. They have a strange program whereby they're giving free access to "Web publishers" which includes bloggers. They also have a way to allow these Web publishers to offer links to Britannica content to non-Web-publishers that allow specific access to the linked content but not the general access Web publishers will have. That'll be an interesting trick.

A lot of folks were entertained by the idea of a mini computer in a hamster ball as a pet.

What's more, the idea that it could use that Web cam as an eye is pretty close to true. Check out this video of a mobile visual search engine on the Apple iPhone. (The actual site for the product is here.) It's funny to think we were just talking about QR codes and putting these odd bar codes on everything that could then be translated by special software on your cell phone. But why bother when you phone can be programmed to recognize actual real images?

Speaking of search engines, green search engine Ecocho: "For every 1000 searches that users make on ecocho.com, up to two trees will be grown to offset carbon pollution emissions." It's getting hit pretty hard but I found that if I got a "too many connections" error I could hit refresh and get through on the second try. Also comes in less-energy using black version. (Is this how that rice site worked?)

Speaking of rice, this article about food rationing coming to America feels like the one we saw recently about tent cities forming because of people losing their houses. Is this total crap or do I just not realize what's going on because I don't buy rice by the sack?

I'm gonna git you Spamma

Cool map of where news breaks - As the blogger anticipates, my first reaction was that this is really then just a map of population because people = news. "But even allowing for population, some locations account for a disproportionately high number of news items."

My Commuter Click today was The Reality of Depending on True Fans. I really liked the idea of the 1,000 True Fan theory that says that in order to make a living in your niche you need to be a microcelebrity to a thousand True Fans. I especially like that it addresses the broader problem of trying to put online numbers in context. How many is a lot online? How many hate mails means you're hated? How many page views means you're popular? How much is "viral"? The personal immediacy of online communication makes it difficult to be objective about the size of a crowd. Have you ever been in a chat room with 3000 people? It's mayhem. Have you ever tried to put a positive spin on a memo to an NBC executive about a live online event  that only drew 3000 people when even bad TV ratings are measured in millions? The True Fan idea, though not specifically about Web traffic, at least begins to offer some meaning to the numbers. Anyway, the Commuter Click is a follow-up in which a guy who actually has a thousand True Fans talks about what their worth is in his particular niche (ambient music). Turns out you probably need a few more than a thousand True Fans to make a living.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Will,
The guy is right...
The meteorologists here are laughable, at best. Why do they even bother beyond 24 hours? Inaccurate forecasts DO get noticed and it hurts their credibility.
What if the news anchor reported the news with only 75% accuracy? Instant unemployment. Not so for meteorologists, where fuzzy science is their  milieu.
I've always wondered if "the same as yesterday" wouldn't be a more accurate weather prediction than anything else?
Alex from KC: If the news anchors had to predict the news for the rest of the week, I would be surprised if they got anywhere near 75% accuracy.  Forecasting is an inexact science, but it is a science.  Google "chaos theory" and "Edward Lorenz" for an explanation of why longer range predictions are less likely to be accurate.


David from IL: That's called persistence forecasting, and yes it could be called more "accurate" over a given span of time.  But if there is a significant weather event moving in sometime in the next 24-26 hours, would you rather the weatherman ignored it and predicted more sunshine tomorrow, or told you that there is an x% chance of rain, even if he was off by a half-day or so on the timing?

In spite of the obstacles, weather models & forecasts are constantly improving, particularly in the area of severe storm/tornado warnings.  The weak point now is the "last mile" - alerting the public that a tornado is imminent, especially in the middle of the night. If they don't have the TV or radio on, and can't hear the sirens, they are in trouble.  Having a NOAA weather radio in your home can help with that, since it reponds to local watches/warnings with audible and visual alerts.


Disclaimer and disclosure: I am not a meteorologist, but I work closely with them as a contract systems engineer for the National Weather Service.
As far as the six-wheeled car goes, designers at Tyrrel F1 had this figured out in the seventies.  It was so effective that F1 banned it after only a few races.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyrrell_P34
6 wheel sports cars aren't new, they date back to at least 1976 when the Tyrell team raced a 6 wheel Formula one car - see wikipedia here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:ScheckterJody1976-07-31Tyrrell-FordP34.jpg
I just scanned through the comments on the original article, and there are some good ones from actual meteorologists who explain things much better than I did.  #125 from Tom H. is particularly informative.
From what I've seen, even a simple newspaper article may not be 100% accurate.  I've been at events where I know something about the topic and I recognize the reporter covering the event.  About a third of the article was completely wrong, a third was subject to interpretation and a third was completely accurate.  If you are generous, that yields a 66.6666...% accuracy rating.  If the 'subject to interpretation' rate is considered to be on the inaccurate side, it drops to 33.3333...% accuracy.
I'm glad you linked to the Robert Rich discussion. So much has been made about established artists making money from direct downloads over the internet, but by-and-large, these artists have already benefited from an older, established system that helped build their profile in the first place. This gives a more realistic perspective on the good and bad that comes with direct access.
I know the price of everything is going up, but why is this the first time I've heard mention of actual rationing by stores?  I do usually think of "food rationing" as being government imposed.  The use of the term in the article, while technically OK, seems a bit sensational.  Interesting.
The weather forecast article is interesting, no doubt, but let's not forget we're talking about predictions, not reporting. (For Alex, KC -If your local news anchor needed to predict 7 days out whether there was going to be a robbery, I imagine they wouldn't be very accurate either.)

And shouldn't the precipitation measure be based more loosely? The forecaster is giving a percentage b/c of the relative uncertainty no? One of the commenters on Freakonics blog put it better - "if for all the times So-and-so predicted 30%, it rained 23% of the time, he’d be off by 7% for that prediction."
It's always seemed to me that TV meteorologists have the only career in the world where they can be utterly, completely wrong on a regular basis, and still keep their jobs.

Also, the narrator on "I'm Gonna Git You, Spamma"? Tay Zonday, AKA the Chocolate Rain guy.
ummm... the title of the article is completely misleading, and i have absolutely no idea what kind of a point the author is trying to make (if any at all).  in fact the whole article seems like a collection of random unrelated things thrown together to meet a deadline.  what is going on in this article?!
"It's always seemed to me that TV meteorologists have the only career in the world where they can be utterly, completely wrong on a regular basis, and still keep their jobs."

Or President of the United States, so it seems.
Salm, the point is not to have an article, but a series of "clicks"... random things that are popular or ar attracting interest on the web... the headline is typically just the first thing on his mind I suppose, but not typically an indicator of all that will be included.

I happen to love it.
Salm, Clicked (this article is actually an entry is a series of posts that constitute a blog called Clicked) is actually a bit of an odd duck. The idea is to help my readers follow Web trends by sharing the things I clicked in the course of doing so myself.

What's problematic with following this style of reporting is that while it's typical of blogging, it doesn't suit the headline/article format the rest of msnbc.com follows. Generally I try to put something meatier at the top of an entry to justify the headline but really it could have the same headline every time: What's hot on the Web.

To KM and other regular readers, to the credit of the msnbc.com tech editors they've been trying to give Clicked a little more attention on the front page of the Tech section, in spite of the squareness of this peg. New readers unfamiliar with what the heck is going on here will likely be common for a while.
Any idiot can look at a satellite image of an approaching front and predict rain within the next 24 hours.

Predictions beyond 48-72 hours are no better than guesses.  I hesitate to even call them educated guesses, they are so seldom correct, so why even make them.
ya Tania Derveaux is part of the Movielol website that also involves themselves in political issues. Also as a part of the Athene youtube series.
In relation to the sex 4 support of net neutrality girl, she also is alleging to commit suicide in 90 days. Not sure why, but she has a page on that too.
The Wonder Twins never had rings - a popular misconception.
abc15 here in Phoenix HAS been advertising themselves as "the most accurate forecast" as determined by some 3 party review.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=935103