ABOUT CLICKED

The modern news consumer ignores Weblogs and online citizen journalism at his own peril. But not everyone has the time to keep track of what's going on the Web. With this blog we hope to track the highlights of what's being discussed online so when news breaks from the Web, we're ready.

Will Femia is a Weblog enthusiast who, through good fortune and dumb luck, was introduced to the form as his position as chat producer for MSNBC.com careered into obsolescence. On any given day, Will can be found having already spent an unhealthy amount of time squinting at a computer screen.

Send a message to Will at spotter@msnbc.com



A tangled Web at the RNC

Posted: Thursday, September 04, 2008 3:01 PM by Will Femia

Something bothers me about the accusation that Barack Obama has no significant legislation in the Senate to his credit. Actually what bothered me in the past is that this point is usually made by an Obama opponent asking, "Can you name one piece of legislation Obama got through the Senate?" And the TV host or pundit being questioned is too poorly informed to have an answer. So the implication is that Obama's done nothing.

This, of course, is not true. And beyond the weak preparation of the TV media, what's bothered me most is that I can name one piece of legislation Obama's had a hand in and, at least on the Internet, it is part of a relatively famous story. What's more, it actually came up last night at the Republican National Convention, apparently completely unnoticed in the glare of Palin's performance: The Coburn-Obama Transparency Bill a.k.a. The Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006.

Carly Fiorina, former Hewlett-Packard chairwoman and vociferous McCain advocate mentioned this in her address to the convention: "In his first year in office, he [McCain] will subject every government agency to a top to bottom review and post the results on the Internet for all Americans to see."

That may be the easiest promise for McCain to keep from his whole campaign because to a large degree, it's already done. In 2006, Barack Obama and Republican Senator Tom Coburn introduced legislation to put the government's business in a free searchable public online database. The idea was that by granting the public access to how federal money is doled out, legislators would be loath to make secret sweetheart deals with lobbyists and local interests.

I'm not enough of a historian to know how connected associated events were at the time, but the again-famous "Bridge to Nowhere" story was still fresh in the headlines, Lawrence Lessig was drawing a lot of attention to the idea of "open government," and bloggers were making history with the collective research and activism for which they're now so famous.

From my perspective as a Web observer, the way the story played out was that this bipartisan Coburn-Obama legislation, heralded by political bloggers as part of a public access revolution, was being blocked by one or more anonymous senators through a tactic called a "secret hold." (Apparently in the Senate it's possible to block legislation without having to reveal yourself as doing so.)

Bloggers wouldn't stand for that however, and launched a campaign to flush out the mystery bill blockers by calling their senators individually and getting them to declare publicly their position on the bill and whether they were responsible for the hold. As the process eliminated suspects it was eventually revealed that Democratic Senator Robert Byrd and Republican Senator Ted Stevens (the man behind the Bridge to Nowhere) were responsible for the hold. Upon being exposed, the holds were lifted and President Bush signed the bill into law. The result was USASepnding.gov, "Where Americans can see where their money goes."

Senators Obama and Coburn have continued to work on the project, introducing the Strengthening Transparency and Accountability in Federal Spending Act of 2008 (S. 3077). It isn't very pretty to read but looks to be mostly about improving the site's features and function. In my amateur reading it appears to set deadlines for compliance throughout 2009 or, as Ms. Fiorina puts it, the new president's first year in office.

I should point out that Fiorina is not wrong for describing the bill as a promise from John McCain. Not only is this a bipartisan project, but McCain's name is mentioned prominently in the paperwork:
By Mr. COBURN (for himself, Mr. OBAMA, Mr. CARPER, and Mr. MCCAIN): S. 2590. A bill to require full disclosure of all entities and organizations receiving Federal funds; to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Obama may have greater ownership of the bill (lengthy audio here, brief CNN interview here), but given McCain's history on Web issues, his involvement in something that casts the Web as a public utility is remarkable enough.

I don't know very much about Obama's activities in government. I only know this one small thing because it was part of a larger online drama, but that's all I need to know to suffer significant cognitive dissonance from the emphasis at the RNC that Obama has done nothing, has not reached across party lines and has no record as a reformer. In this one act he's done all three and with the cooperation of the Republican candidate to boot.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

I want to know what legislation John McCain passed his first two years in office.
uh what is this article doing in the tech and science section on the web page?  Is the editor asleep or just trying to push his/her bias?
Chrism,

The difference, of course, is that John McCain didn't think he was qualified to run for President after the first two years.  Maybe if Obama had waited 15 years or so, he'd have a meatier resume to offer.

Tom
I guess if you want to know about McCain's first 2 years you'll have to do some research because he's actually been in office longer than that.
Has anyone found a way to download the 2008 GOP party platform?  I have tried www.gop.com/platform site but it will not download.  FYI:  The democratic platform is an easy search and download (without commercials).  As a concerned citizen who does not want all the rhetoric, I plan to make my decision on the platform instead.  Thanks
Audrey, I'll take your question at face value because I'm a fan of source documents. You want this.
http://platform.gop.com/2008Platform.pdf
Did anyone read about the transperancy bill? Yes Obama was involved in it, but so was John McCain. from the link......The bill was introduced by Senator Tom Coburn, for himself and Senators Barack Obama, Tom Carper and John McCain on April 6, 2006.[3] After a "secret hold" was revealed and removed, it was passed unanimously in the Senate on September 7, 2006 and by the House on September 13, 2006. The bill was signed into law by President George W. Bush on September 26, 2006.[4] ......

"I should point out that Fiorina is not wrong for describing the bill as a promise from John McCain. Not only is this a bipartisan project, but McCain's name is mentioned prominently in the paperwork:"

That would make sense, since the preliminary idea was forced through by McCain and THEN supported by Obama, not the other way around.

"Has anyone found a way to download the 2008 GOP party platform?  I have tried www.gop.com/platform site but it will not download."

Yeah, should be an easy google, I downloaded it easily with maybe fifteen seconds of searching (and also free from commercials).  The site you mentioned also worked immediately for me without any problems, so I'd need more details to try and figure out what's wrong with yours.  Had my family all try the download as well, as all say it was a very easy search and download.

Will already offered you the .pdf, so I won't bother posting it, but that was going to be my next action as well.  Anyway, hope his link helps.
Thanks Will, it's nice to see some journalism and research go into a story.  We don't see that very often in the MSM.
As I understand it Obama, all told is responsible for over 1100 pieces of legislation

Just one of the changes Obama has made while in the U.S. Senate.  


Senate Passes Coburn-Obama Bill to Create Internet Database of ...
Sep 8, 2006 ... WASHINGTON - U.S. Senators Barack Obama (D-IL) and Tom Coburn (R-OK) today hailed the Senate's passage of the "Federal Funding ...
obama.senate.gov/press/060908-senate_passes_c/ - 8k - Cached - Similar pages

Obama, Coburn Introduce Bill Requiring Public Disclosure of All ...
Apr 7, 2006 ... WASHINGTON - U.S. Senators Barack Obama (D-IL) and Tom Coburn, M.D. (R-OK) today announced the introduction of legislation that would ...
obama.senate.gov/press/060407-coburn_introduc/ - 8k - Cached - Similar pages
More results from obama.senate.gov »
You are kidding Will, right?  No one remembered the quote (paraphrased here, I am too lazy to actually look it up) "Oh, What a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive." from an epic poem by Sir Walter Scott (usually mis-attributed to William Shakespeare)?  No one knew that?  Yikes.
Hmmm... seems like if it weren't for more senior Senate members Obama's name wouldn't even be onthis one.. and it's really not.  He was a co-sponsor, along with ... wait for it... John McCain

The bill was introduced by Senator Tom Coburn, for himself and Senators Barack Obama, Tom Carper and John McCain on April 6, 2006.[3] After a "secret hold" was revealed and removed, it was passed unanimously in the Senate on September 7, 2006 and by the House on September 13, 2006. The bill was signed into law by President George W. Bush on September 26, 2006.[4]

On June 3, 2008, Senator Obama, along with Senators Carper, Coburn and McCain, introduced follow-up legislation: Strengthening Transparency and Accountability in Federal Spending Act of 2008.[5]
Mark- Uh, I think it's in Tech/Science because it's a bill involving Tech/Science. And, should pointing out a fact about a bipartisan bill that's being partially misrepresented at the RNC be considered "bias"? I guess it depends on your own bias..
Apparently, the difference between authoring and co-sponsoring a bill is missed in this discussion. There were 46 other co-sponsors. Obama didn't author the bill Coburn did, nor was it a "significant piece of legislation." I don't think this legislation meets anyone's test of Obama's ability to significant law. Ironically, once the issue of Obama's legislative track record came to light, he introduced a follow-on bill in June 2008...can we say "reactive?"
Its so nice of McCain to promise to obey the law that Obama pushed through and he himself supported...
John Doe's brother in law, I actually meant the "no sleep 'till" headline on the mext entry, but thanks for getting this one too. :)

To folks raising the point that McCain and Obama are equal cosponsors of Coburn's bill, that's what I thought at first as well but it's clear from all of the coverage at the time (and this was before Obama was running for president) that it was refered to as the "Coburn-Obama transparency bill." I suspect there are Senate rules or traditions that govern why both Coburn and Obama didn't submit the bill together just as there must be a reason why the other senators were named separately from the other cosponsors.

Much of the coverage of the introduction of the bill names both Coburn and Obama as doing the introducing. It's odd to see that when President Bush signed the bill he left out McCain in his note of thanks. " I want to thank the bill sponsors, Tom Coburn from Oklahoma, Tom Carper from Delaware, and Barack Obama from Illinois. "
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/09/20060926.html

In Coburn's own press release he shares top billing with Obama and lists the better known cosponsors, including McCain, at the bottom.
http://coburn.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=LatestNews.PressReleases&ContentRecord_id=8dcb8c35-802a-23ad-4d37-9c8ea9c43460

Tom, the follow-up bill doesn't look like much more than a statement that the previous bill is worth maintaining and adding a few improvements. Given the range of topics Obama could have tried to exploit (and maybe did for all I know) I wouldn't guess this was one of them. Then again, it's interesting to see how the matter was handled by transparency advocates who were hopeful that the fact that both candidates support government transparency might actually mean we'll have a transparent government:
http://www.ombwatch.org/article/blogs/entry/5072/50
Will,

There is certainly "transparency" of most (if not all) of those non-"black" contracts.  By their very nature (and I'll bet if we read the legislation front to back) "black" programs are at a higher level than "TOP SECRET."  In other words, we don't know what we don't know. (And probably never will.)
Bob from PA, I'm not sure where that number would come from unless maybe he was really active in the state legislature or something. Or else you'd need to have a REALLY loose definition of "responsible." If you go to the Thomas database and browse for Obama's name in the "by sponsor" list you get 129 results.
http://thomas.loc.gov/
"I guess if you want to know about McCain's first 2 years you'll have to do some research because he's actually been in office longer than that."

Really? I had no idea!

My point is that, if you think passing legislation in congress makes one a better candidate for president, then I guess you can have that discussion.  Historically I think it shows to be totally irrelevant.

But if the argument is that he hasn't "done anything" since he's been in office, then yes you need compare his first two years against the average first two years of congresspersons, and especially against McCain.  When you have something like a Secret hold, or a bill dead in subcommittee, it's near impossible for rookies to get anything done in Congress.  That's why change takes so long, because the fresh blood doesn't get much of chance to do more than talk.
what really gets me is that we are all worried about who sponsored this or that!! I wish people could just work together, instead of pointing fingers and not supporting a bill because a Dem. or Rep. authored it!!I believe the president should be the one with the most votes and VP second place person. No tickets, no picking VP's, Obama wins, MCcain is the VP, or vice versa!!We might actually get something done then!!! anyone agree?
Will,
You said it yourself: "Something bothers me about the accusation that Barack Obama has no significant legislation in the Senate to his credit."  Operative term here is "significant," of which your one example isn't.
1100 pieces of legislation? And on the seventh day, he rested!
Thanks for showing us your politics. Now when every I read your blog it will be tainted by you supporting Oboma. Thats just great!
Will I used to like you until you became a politician.
"No Veep til..."

"No Sleep 'til Brooklyn" by the Beastie Boys

Have that on my Zune... (starts searching playlist)
The link provided in the story doesn't work too well. This one should: http://www.usaspending.gov/


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1348561