<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Seeing loud and clear</title><link>http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/19/368571.aspx</link><description>Virtual worlds open up to blind - I scoffed at this at first, thinking it was the latest Second Life gimmick but it has some cool thinking at its root. In some cases they're talking about overt verbal descriptions of objects in the virtual world, and</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Build: 60608.1)</generator><item><title>Seeing loud and clear</title><link>http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/19/368571.aspx#368883</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 20:21:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:368883</guid><dc:creator>Tristin, Provo, Utah</dc:creator><description>Will! You forgot to snope out an article before you posted it! The &amp;quot;indiscretions committed by members of congress&amp;quot; article is mostly bogus. My South African wife recently got the same article in an email about the government in South Africa. Check out the Snopes.com page:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.snopes.com/politics/crime/congress.asp"&gt;http://www.snopes.com/politics/crime/congress.asp&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>Seeing loud and clear</title><link>http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/19/368571.aspx#368910</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 20:32:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:368910</guid><dc:creator>Howlin' Hobbit, Seattle, WA</dc:creator><description>Re: &amp;quot;Police kick some jerk's butt video of the day&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;quot;This video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by WNDU-TV&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nice job, MSM. Wonder where we can find the video now.</description></item><item><title>Seeing loud and clear</title><link>http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/19/368571.aspx#368944</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 20:44:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:368944</guid><dc:creator>Clint, Chicago, Illinois</dc:creator><description>Two priests walk into a bar. A third one ducks. </description></item><item><title>Seeing loud and clear</title><link>http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/19/368571.aspx#368958</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 20:48:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:368958</guid><dc:creator>Will Femia</dc:creator><description>Tristin, thanks. I knew something wasn't quite right with it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hobbit, geee, I don't know, maybe the WNDU-TV site?&lt;br&gt;(&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.wndu.com/videoplus/headlines/9834111.html"&gt;http://www.wndu.com/videoplus/headlines/9834111.html&lt;/a&gt;)</description></item><item><title>Seeing loud and clear</title><link>http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/19/368571.aspx#369043</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 21:16:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:369043</guid><dc:creator>tony gallucci</dc:creator><description>here's the Snopes look at the congressional wrongdoing piece, which has been circulating via email for some time:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.snopes.com/politics/crime/congress.asp"&gt;http://www.snopes.com/politics/crime/congress.asp&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>Seeing loud and clear</title><link>http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/19/368571.aspx#369146</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 22:08:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:369146</guid><dc:creator>Jess, Boston, MA</dc:creator><description>Alien Overlords...great Simpsons reference Will! &amp;nbsp;One of my favorite episodes too...</description></item><item><title>Seeing loud and clear</title><link>http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/19/368571.aspx#369241</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 23:05:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:369241</guid><dc:creator>Scott, Melbourne, Australia</dc:creator><description>Love the Simpsons reference Kent!</description></item><item><title>Seeing loud and clear</title><link>http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/19/368571.aspx#369473</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 02:14:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:369473</guid><dc:creator>Marjorie, Illinois</dc:creator><description>Hey Will,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Star Wars Lego game that is coming out this fall will have lightsaber capabilities with the Wiimote. &amp;nbsp;I played it at Comic-con and it was AWESOME.</description></item><item><title>Seeing loud and clear</title><link>http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/19/368571.aspx#369583</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 04:54:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:369583</guid><dc:creator>Chris Browning, Stillwater</dc:creator><description>The food digestion times...the source seems marginal at best. I'm skeptical.</description></item><item><title>Seeing loud and clear</title><link>http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/19/368571.aspx#369679</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 10:03:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:369679</guid><dc:creator>David, Germany</dc:creator><description>The business with the egg and the equinox is a myth. You can stand an egg on end any day of the year. See this:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/egg_spin.html"&gt;http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/egg_spin.html&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>Seeing loud and clear</title><link>http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/19/368571.aspx#369706</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 11:52:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:369706</guid><dc:creator>Chris, Baltimore</dc:creator><description>Think maybe there's some bad science going on. The equinox/egg theory is bunk. You can balance an egg any day of the year...should be able to check snopes.com on that. </description></item><item><title>Seeing loud and clear</title><link>http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/19/368571.aspx#369880</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 13:47:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:369880</guid><dc:creator>Will Femia</dc:creator><description>David, Chris, I was trying to make a joke because obviously you don't need to be a week before the equinox to balance a baseball bat either. Maybe I should have phrased it more like, &amp;quot;It may be a myth that eggs balance on end on the equinox but science has yet to fully explain why baseball bats balance themselves on end slightly before the equinox.&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;... or something.</description></item><item><title>Seeing loud and clear</title><link>http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/19/368571.aspx#369909</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:03:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:369909</guid><dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator><description>Actually, the &amp;quot;standing an egg on end during the equinox&amp;quot; is a myth, you can do it any time if you're just careful, and they can stay standing for weeks if you don't bump them. &amp;nbsp;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/egg_spin.html"&gt;http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/egg_spin.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I can only imagine standing a baseball bat on end is about the same.</description></item><item><title>Seeing loud and clear</title><link>http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/19/368571.aspx#370028</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:51:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:370028</guid><dc:creator>Chris, Lawrence, KS</dc:creator><description>The food digestion page seems kinda sketchy. &amp;nbsp;I mean, do certain foods really move through your digestive tract faster than others? &amp;nbsp;If you had eaten a lime an hour ago, and then you ate some parsley, would the parsley race past it at some point on the way down?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sounds like bad science to me. &amp;nbsp;The page would make for some good math problems for kids, though.</description></item><item><title>Seeing loud and clear</title><link>http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/19/368571.aspx#370519</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 16:48:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:370519</guid><dc:creator>Brian, San Francisco CA</dc:creator><description>re: Some of the other comments on digestion - most food takes pretty much the same amount of time to move through your digestive system and come out the other end (a little over a day if I remember correctly). What this seems to be is a chart of how long food takes to break down and have access to the calories and nutrients available in it. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you look at the foods listed at various times, you will notice that the ones at the beginning tend to either be sugary/starchy, soft, or acidic; and the ones at the end tough and fibrous. Fiber is relatively indigestible and makes up most of the solid content of waste, which is why products like Metamucil and Citrucel are so popular for, ahem, &amp;quot;keeping things moving&amp;quot;.</description></item><item><title>Seeing loud and clear</title><link>http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/19/368571.aspx#371236</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 18:14:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:371236</guid><dc:creator>Nadeem Cokar, Calgary, Canada</dc:creator><description>We Canadians still pay anywhere from 5 to 40% more for a lot of items because of higher taxes and transportation costs. &amp;nbsp;The booksellers in Canada just implemented a policy to peg the Canadian dollar at 85 cents US, so prices are supposed to come down. &amp;nbsp;Before that, it was pegged at 65 cents, so this summer even though the Loonie was worth well over 90 cents American, we were still paying 25 cent difference &amp;quot;just because&amp;quot;. &amp;nbsp;You can get a Beemer for $48K in the States that will cost you $25K more here, so people go south, pay the all the fees and still end up $15K ahead. &amp;nbsp;In the end, prices will stay higher because there’s no real overt pressure to reduce them, the distributors won’t lower their prices to the retail outlets because they don’t have to and despite cross-border shopping, the impact of that on a trillion dollar economy isn’t as great as you may think..</description></item><item><title>Seeing loud and clear</title><link>http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/19/368571.aspx#371405</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 18:36:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:371405</guid><dc:creator>Catherine, Toronto, Canada</dc:creator><description>Will,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You're so right about the different prices on books now the C$ and US$ are almost at par. &amp;nbsp;For the last year or so I've loaded up on books everytime I visit the US.</description></item><item><title>Seeing loud and clear</title><link>http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/19/368571.aspx#372770</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 00:07:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:372770</guid><dc:creator>C.C.</dc:creator><description>&amp;quot;Police &amp;nbsp;kick &amp;nbsp;some &amp;nbsp;jerks &amp;nbsp;butt&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;please &amp;nbsp;Will &amp;nbsp;does &amp;nbsp;wearing &amp;nbsp;a &amp;nbsp;badge give &amp;nbsp;you &amp;nbsp;the &amp;nbsp;right &amp;nbsp;to &amp;nbsp;impose &amp;nbsp;your &amp;nbsp;will &amp;nbsp;upon &amp;nbsp;another person.I &amp;nbsp;dont &amp;nbsp;think &amp;nbsp;so &amp;nbsp;maybe &amp;nbsp;you &amp;nbsp;do &amp;nbsp;but &amp;nbsp;if &amp;nbsp;I &amp;nbsp;read &amp;nbsp;the &amp;nbsp;article &amp;nbsp;correctly &amp;nbsp;charges &amp;nbsp;were dropped.&lt;br&gt;We &amp;nbsp;are &amp;nbsp;all &amp;nbsp;allowed &amp;nbsp;the &amp;nbsp;right &amp;nbsp;to &amp;nbsp;dissent &amp;nbsp;in &amp;nbsp;a &amp;nbsp;public &amp;nbsp;forum in &amp;nbsp;a &amp;nbsp;civil &amp;nbsp;manner &amp;nbsp;and &amp;nbsp;nothing &amp;nbsp;I &amp;nbsp;saw &amp;nbsp; says &amp;nbsp;anything &amp;nbsp;different &amp;nbsp;happened.&lt;br&gt;And &amp;nbsp;yes &amp;nbsp;I &amp;nbsp;am &amp;nbsp;one &amp;nbsp;of &amp;nbsp;those &amp;nbsp; United &amp;nbsp;States &amp;nbsp;civilians &amp;nbsp;that &amp;nbsp;thinks &amp;nbsp;the &amp;nbsp;police &amp;nbsp;cannot &amp;nbsp;break &amp;nbsp;the &amp;nbsp;law &amp;nbsp;to &amp;nbsp;enforce &amp;nbsp;the &amp;nbsp;law although &amp;nbsp;my &amp;nbsp;wife &amp;nbsp;thinks &amp;nbsp;differently. &amp;nbsp;lol. &amp;nbsp;needless &amp;nbsp;to &amp;nbsp;say &amp;nbsp;we &amp;nbsp;cant &amp;nbsp;watch &amp;nbsp;C.O.P.S. &amp;nbsp;together. &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;P.S. &amp;nbsp; i &amp;nbsp;hope &amp;nbsp;im &amp;nbsp;there &amp;nbsp;when &amp;nbsp;they &amp;nbsp;assault &amp;nbsp;you &amp;nbsp;I &amp;nbsp;will &amp;nbsp;testify &amp;nbsp;at &amp;nbsp;your &amp;nbsp;civil &amp;nbsp;suit &amp;nbsp;trial</description></item><item><title>Seeing loud and clear</title><link>http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/19/368571.aspx#372794</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 00:23:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:372794</guid><dc:creator>C.C.</dc:creator><description>Not &amp;nbsp;laughing &amp;nbsp;anymore! &amp;nbsp;my &amp;nbsp;wife &amp;nbsp;just &amp;nbsp;watched &amp;nbsp;this &amp;nbsp;video &amp;nbsp;and &amp;nbsp;somehow &amp;nbsp;comes &amp;nbsp;to &amp;nbsp; the &amp;nbsp;conclusion &amp;nbsp;that &amp;nbsp;police &amp;nbsp;have &amp;nbsp;a &amp;nbsp;right &amp;nbsp;to &amp;nbsp; assault &amp;nbsp;civilians &amp;nbsp;if &amp;nbsp;they &amp;nbsp;disagree &amp;nbsp;with &amp;nbsp;them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;huh &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; ill &amp;nbsp;think &amp;nbsp;about &amp;nbsp;it</description></item><item><title>Seeing loud and clear</title><link>http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/19/368571.aspx#373265</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 10:08:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:373265</guid><dc:creator>DJ</dc:creator><description>Will, the several videos available on the WNDU page you linked above are wild stuff. This town's council meetings should be on C-SPAN -- they'd soon have one of the highest rated reality TV shows. It's obvious there is some serious history between David Snyder and some other folks, and not knowing what happened in the past rather limits one's ability to comment fairly on these videos in the present.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That being said, however, the claim by the officer that he was struck by Snyder does not seem to bear out at all by watching the raw footage. Whether or not Snyder had antagonized members of the police force and city council, that seems a pretty blatant loss of control by Officer Tiller -- which everyday folks are guilty of all the time, but which can never be tolerated by someone once they put on a badge and strap on a gun. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What's crazy is that cases like these are tried in the court of public opinion long before they ever get their day in actual court.</description></item><item><title>Seeing loud and clear</title><link>http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/19/368571.aspx#373753</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 14:48:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:373753</guid><dc:creator>Noumenon, Mad., WI</dc:creator><description>Will, those police videos are kind of unique for a link blog, and really add a lot of value. &amp;nbsp;As far as, is this the violence inherent in the system? what does the violence the police protect us from look like if anyone could safely videotape it? am I watching this out of concern or for a sick thrill? &amp;nbsp;I'm starting to value your eclectic way of linking to things because of stuff like this.</description></item><item><title>Seeing loud and clear</title><link>http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/19/368571.aspx#375132</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 23:00:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:375132</guid><dc:creator>Irvine, CA</dc:creator><description>Will&lt;br&gt;You are going out on a limb w Trotten--&amp;quot;why some want to stay in Iraq.&amp;quot; Anbar found out Taliban way worse than U.S. Okay, but has little to do w the rest of Iraq. More balance please.</description></item><item><title>Seeing loud and clear</title><link>http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/19/368571.aspx#398499</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 13:03:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:398499</guid><dc:creator>Joe Columbia, SC</dc:creator><description>WNDU should lose its NBC affiliation. &amp;nbsp;They are tainting NBC's reputation. &amp;nbsp;They have gone as far as only posting negative comments about the Snyders and rejecting those that are against police brutality. &amp;nbsp;They are a sad excuse for a news source.</description></item><item><title>Seeing loud and clear</title><link>http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/09/19/368571.aspx#400164</link><pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 12:07:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:400164</guid><dc:creator>Nathan Fluet</dc:creator><description>You can keep up to date on the Snyder's situation by going here&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://abuse-of-power.org/modules/content/index.php?id=32"&gt;http://abuse-of-power.org/modules/content/index.php?id=32&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have links to all of the articles about the incident plus Press Releases that David and his wife have sent me posted there.</description></item></channel></rss>