<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Old bread</title><link>http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/18/587577.aspx</link><description>Geneticists Discover a Way to Extend Lifespans to 800 Years - What's weird about this research is that it's phrased as though humans would naturally live much longer if only it weren't for a couple of genes that promote aging. I've read other studies</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Build: 60608.1)</generator><item><title>Old bread</title><link>http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/18/587577.aspx#588231</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:18:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:588231</guid><dc:creator>Lydia</dc:creator><description>Hey Will,&lt;br&gt;FYI, that article about how you shouldn't be a dick to people at your trade show (steve jobs at macworld) has lots of very NSFW stuff all over in the left-hand column of the site. &amp;nbsp;Explicit material. &amp;nbsp;No nudity visible just by clicking the article, but the article's accompanying page contents and subject matter are something someone could definitely get fired for if their boss or co-worker were to see it. &amp;nbsp;I'm really glad our company does not have internet monitoring or I'd be canned by monday!</description></item><item><title>Old bread</title><link>http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/18/587577.aspx#589373</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 23:20:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:589373</guid><dc:creator>Gayle</dc:creator><description>The thing about A Bourdain is that it feels like A Bourdain. Whether it's his books, blog posts, or show episodes, you're always seeing and hearing A Bourdain, not some trussed up &amp;quot;I was some-body&amp;quot; monkey paraded around in front of cameras with a script.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;With A Bourdain, you're getting a genuine person, replete with vulnerabilities, and therein lies his appeal. I only hope that the other would be food/travel show personalities stop trying to imitate him. Do your own thing... a la Andrew Zimmern.</description></item><item><title>Old bread</title><link>http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/18/587577.aspx#589405</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 23:31:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:589405</guid><dc:creator>Gayle, Bay Area, CA</dc:creator><description>Holy Escape from the Circus! I just saw that fashion link.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I did appreciate that some of those male models nearly nailed the Blue Steel and Magnum.</description></item><item><title>Old bread</title><link>http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/18/587577.aspx#589828</link><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 03:00:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:589828</guid><dc:creator>Jay, Blacksburg, Virginia</dc:creator><description>Knocking out a gene means just that--you zap the bugger. &amp;nbsp;No more signal. &amp;nbsp;It's done as a way to try to figure out &amp;nbsp;the function of individual genes. &amp;nbsp;The problem lies in the complex interactions of genes, because no one gene does one thing. &amp;nbsp;They interact by the tens to thousands, which very rapidly gives you staggering possibilities of combination. &amp;nbsp;Try figuring out the number of pizzas with different toppings you could order at a local pie joint, then extrapolate. &amp;nbsp;There are statisticians who focus their entire careers on trying to understand these probabilities. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The upshot is twofold: &lt;br&gt;1. There is no one Alzheimers gene or cancer gene. &amp;nbsp;There are instead some genes that seem to increase the likelihood of getting these diseases, and no one really understands how.&lt;br&gt;2. Every gene you knock out has more than one job, so the possible ripple effect is huge and unknowable.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, to (sort of) answer your question, the diet is not telling the genes to signal less. &amp;nbsp;The researchers shut the genes off, then restricted the diet to see what else happened. &lt;br&gt; </description></item><item><title>Old bread</title><link>http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/18/587577.aspx#595791</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:16:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:595791</guid><dc:creator>Mr Scratchy</dc:creator><description>I just saw the fashion link. &amp;nbsp;Ugh. &amp;nbsp;It reinforced my opinion that the people of the fashion industry are some of the most vapid, self-centered and worthless people to stain the planet.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Stan Lee tribute was tops, though. &amp;nbsp;My comic book afficionado friends will be thrilled.</description></item><item><title>Old bread</title><link>http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/18/587577.aspx#596238</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 22:39:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:596238</guid><dc:creator>Jeanne Scarff, Ontario, CA</dc:creator><description>Will, check out Bourdain. The first time my husband and I saw the show, we were hooked. His intellect and humor can't be matched by any &amp;quot;Food Network&amp;quot; host.</description></item></channel></rss>