<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Big fat rebuttals</title><link>http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/10/26/8856.aspx</link><description>A mailbag rebuttal:

Re:&amp;nbsp; Snopes take on vegemite banNot sure if this confirms or denies the vegemite report, but thought it interesting.Michael
Will adds:&amp;nbsp; I'd say "denies" or for the purposes of this post, "rebuts."
Speaking of down under,</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Build: 60608.1)</generator><item><title>Big fat rebuttals</title><link>http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/10/26/8856.aspx#8861</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 16:17:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:8861</guid><dc:creator>EColi</dc:creator><description>Mailbag Jim is falling into the same Correlatin v. Causation trap that the Cornell study falls into.  The mercury in vaccines has been studied and restudied by actual scientists (as opposed to the Thymerasol paranoid crowd) at NIH and CDC and found to have no effect.  The TV problem is just silly; the factor the both of these statistics (the use of Thymerasol &amp; increased TV watching) are tracking is the age of the FATHERS.  The closer to present date you get, the more tv your kid watches, the more thymerasol is in use, and the higher the chance that the father is old.  And an old dad tends to fire little mutations, a link which has been proven and is more believable than either of the paranoid crowds with it in for a technology.  The father's age link was reported right here on MSNBC.COM!</description></item><item><title>Big fat rebuttals</title><link>http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/10/26/8856.aspx#8865</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 16:50:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:8865</guid><dc:creator>anon</dc:creator><description>did you intend for both Obama links to be the same?</description></item><item><title>Big fat rebuttals</title><link>http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/10/26/8856.aspx#8866</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 16:54:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:8866</guid><dc:creator>Sorchia</dc:creator><description>Is it a political statement that anyone who wants to know "Why Obama should run for president" is directed to "Why Obama is overrated?"</description></item><item><title>Big fat rebuttals</title><link>http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/10/26/8856.aspx#8873</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 17:05:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:8873</guid><dc:creator>Will Femia</dc:creator><description>Sorry, adding those bullets messed up the hyperlink.  I fixed it to point at this link:
http://www.mydd.com/story/2006/10/22/175546/30
Thanks for pointing it out.</description></item><item><title>Big fat rebuttals</title><link>http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/10/26/8856.aspx#8916</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 20:53:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:8916</guid><dc:creator>Patrick, Chicago, IL</dc:creator><description>Re: Rapist news photo.

I don't know if it's fake or not, but that is Marc Brown from the Los Angeles affiliate. You can see his bio at: http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=bios&amp;id=3378561</description></item></channel></rss>