<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>What do you think this is, the Internet?</title><link>http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/10/27/9225.aspx</link><description>"Bloggers are being asked to show their support for freedom of expression by Amnesty International."
Of course, you have to actually be able to view blogs in order for them to convey any kind of message.
Speaking of stuff you can't view, I'm surprised</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Build: 60608.1)</generator><item><title>What do you think this is, the Internet?</title><link>http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/10/27/9225.aspx#9236</link><pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 07:38:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:9236</guid><dc:creator>Dee</dc:creator><description>"Speaking of President Bush, check out this cool toy.  You drag the words from the bank into the speech pane to play a speech in President Bush's voice....It takes some work to find pieces that make a coherent sentence, but it's better than the more common soundboards we usually see."

Oh Man!  You gonna tee 'em up like that I gotta take swing!  If ONLY Bush could make a coherent sentence in real life!  

Sorry, couldn't resist!</description></item><item><title>What do you think this is, the Internet?</title><link>http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/10/27/9225.aspx#9258</link><pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 22:37:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:9258</guid><dc:creator>Josh (Madison, WI)</dc:creator><description>comedy central cips are STILL on youtube</description></item><item><title>What do you think this is, the Internet?</title><link>http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/10/27/9225.aspx#9263</link><pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 01:45:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:9263</guid><dc:creator>John, Cedar Rapids, IA</dc:creator><description>When I clicked on the neighboroo link it said it was in beta, and boy is it ever. It reported my city's population as half of what it actually is. I would recommend the less slick but more accurate demographics site at www.epodunk.com</description></item><item><title>What do you think this is, the Internet?</title><link>http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/10/27/9225.aspx#9297</link><pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 21:58:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:9297</guid><dc:creator>Alex, Lawrence, KS</dc:creator><description>I thought the McCleans article about how much the internet sucks was particularly true. We (grad students) had a discussion here the other day about whether our research benefitted at all from the existence of the internet...and we unanimously decided that things were actually easier (and sources more accurate) without it.</description></item><item><title>What do you think this is, the Internet?</title><link>http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/10/27/9225.aspx#9299</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 02:36:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:9299</guid><dc:creator>Hal, Indianapolis,IN</dc:creator><description>Um, regarding Steele and Stem cell research, he does NOT support what is commonly referred to as stem cell research (ie, destruction of embryos to acquire the cells), he only supports the research if youy can extract the cells without destroying the embryos (possible, but not practical for quite a while yet).  Just a bit of advice, never believe anything you read on powerline, they are the blog equivalent of Limbaugh...</description></item><item><title>What do you think this is, the Internet?</title><link>http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/10/27/9225.aspx#9300</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 02:38:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:9300</guid><dc:creator>Chris, Baltimore, MD</dc:creator><description>Michael J Fox's ads are specific to "embryonic stem cell research," which is nearly unanimously believed by the science community to be the most promising research. Michael Steele opposes embryonic stem-cell research, completely.</description></item><item><title>What do you think this is, the Internet?</title><link>http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/10/27/9225.aspx#9310</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 04:45:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:9310</guid><dc:creator>Josh, Denver CO</dc:creator><description>Steele, the GOP Candidate from Maryland, is against Federal Funding of research using EMBRYONIC stem cells; which is the vote that Fox's ad cites. So he basically touting Bush's position that the adult stem cell lines are the only ones worthy of federal funding.

I saw Steele interveiwed on Meet the Press this morning, and he definitely opposes embryonic research, which does have almost universal support in the scientific community. His argument was that he viewed that as the "takiung of a life". What I found funny is that when pressed, Russert got Steele to admit that he does NOT support the closing of the handful of Fertility Clinics in Maryland that routinely throw out embryos that could be used (as the compromise bill that Bush vetoed stated) in research for MS, Parkinsons, and other diseases. If that's his stand, he has to follow through and demand the Fertility clinics close, or support the compromise bill. Double standard??  </description></item><item><title>What do you think this is, the Internet?</title><link>http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/10/27/9225.aspx#9316</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 12:28:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:9316</guid><dc:creator>Amy, Cincinnati, Ohio</dc:creator><description>I am anti-MySpace for various reasons, but I do blog on Blogger, about being a cop's wife. I got repeat requests from an erotic blogger that I link to her, simply because she is dating a cop. She continued requesting after I told her specifically why I wouldn't link to her. So it's not just limited to MySpace.  Of course since Blogger is becoming a huge community, I guess that goes right along with Wil's theory about the inverse ratio of users vs. quality. </description></item><item><title>What do you think this is, the Internet?</title><link>http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/10/27/9225.aspx#9364</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:21:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:9364</guid><dc:creator>Brent Garripee, Novi, MI</dc:creator><description>I went to YouTube to see if I could still access John Stewart's post-9/11 monologue and instead found a lot of user-created videos that had paragraphs of unrelated search-terms.  Each user was using the same, stock list of termm; I guess "fake spam" would be a good term for this.  Seems as if spam truly has pervaded our lives.  </description></item><item><title>What do you think this is, the Internet?</title><link>http://clicked.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/10/27/9225.aspx#1271996</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 03:05:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1271996</guid><dc:creator>Arnie</dc:creator><description>It's been 2 years since this post, I wonder where Video Code Zone ranks today? &amp;nbsp;Plummeting?</description></item></channel></rss>